Reported by:
  • Cumeatr : Do you even get reports on these anymore? I still want to see what the cool kids are talking about
  • DuckPioneer : so try being cool

We’re in the antiworkcord

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1684135621980559.webp

Invite link: https://groomercord.com/invite/DSKPrnWuGj

Update: I have been banned for reacting to a single message with a based department pepe

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841356224747813.webp


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1707881499271494.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17101210991135056.webp

102
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reading theory is legitimately pretty gay since being literate is also gay.

Also, Engels really seems like a psychopath.

“Killing? Lmao based” - Engels

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you want peace, prepare for war

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Have you noticed that every human ideology except pacifism has some instance where killing in great numbers and to the sound of trumpets is laudable and permitted? Rly makes u think

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pacifism is probably the most r-slurred "ideology" out there. The other side isn't going to stop their onslaught, especially with a newly formed socialist state that threatens their stability. In order for socialism to succeed enemies and traitors have to be taken seriously. It's just the sad reality

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They have absolutely no delusions about the other side sparing them. That’s not pacifism. Pacifism entails making the moral choice that, despite the fact that it will definitely not be okay, they are willing to accept that to forgo committing what is to them, an even greater evil. It is also for this reason that pacifists cannot be helpless, as that defeats the whole moral potency of pacifism, the fact that it is a choice. Likewise, the imposition of pacifism also means it’s not a choice. Pacifism is also virtually dead as an ideology. I know of no pacifists except the Anabaptists and the Jains, not in real life anyway.

Have you noticed that no totalitarian state will tolerate pacifists? They’re not exactly worthy enemies.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds stupid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you think it’s stupid if they know, or is it more unwise?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it's stupid in general and it's basically a suicide cult

And trying to spread this so called morality only makes it easier for people to be oppressed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the first time I’ve heard “actively malicious, want people to be oppressed” as an explanation for pacifists. Not sure I agree with that.

But I generally use them as a litmus test to determine whether I’m speaking with an ideologue. The rejection of someone else’s pacifism directly entails insisting that the pacifist must kill. It is basically a statement that for someone else to refuse to kill is literally intolerable.

Since everyone absolutely loathes pacifists, who are by definition harmless, I generally take from this that almost everyone is a bloodthirsty extremist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Meh he's a realist. People who think a revolution can be without bloodshed are stupid beyond belief.

This is why I wish to shoot all revolutionaries, esp the ones who proclaim themselves so, outright. Everyone knows what will happen if they win, since I have status quo on my side now why shouldn't I do to them what they'd do to me?

         

Too bad this cucked country doesn't allow you to shoot communists legally.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What about Gandhi or what happened in Iran (at least initially)?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What about him? Do you think Gandhi brought a revolution?

      

:marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh: :marseylaugh:

          

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Indian_Navy_mutiny

   

Mahatma Gandhi, in fact, condemned the riots and the ratings' revolt. His statement on 3 March 1946 criticized the strikers for revolting without the call of a "prepared revolutionary party" and without the "guidance and intervention" of "political leaders of their choice".

            

Nooo you can't just mutiny without us telling you to you dumb peasants nooo.

     

:soycry: :soycry: :soycry:

              

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/meet-sergeant-major-mohandas-karamchand-gandhi/articleshow/44124189.cms

    

In fact, after Kheda satyagraha ended, Gandhi aggressively started campaigning for the war as a recruiting officer of the empire

             

Our independence was granted by the Anglos because of domestic politics and American pressure, . Gandhi did not do shit. Except get many dumb retards injured/killed obeying him and his 'tardation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've read about the Navy mutiny, iirc a good chunk of the Indian officers and enlisted were not for it but the mutineers just chucked them into the ocean. Meanwhile, the based Army stayed loyal to the Crown. :marseysalutearmy:

And Gandhi condemning the mutiny could be seen as tit for tat given that it was (mostly) supported by the Commies and led by them who were the ones who sided against his WWII protest.

In fact, after Kheda satyagraha ended, Gandhi aggressively started campaigning for the war as a recruiting officer of the empire

Yeah so? The bulk of Indians were loyal to the Empire at this point, I wouldn't be surprised if it was higher than 95%. The Amritsar massacre was set off the domino chain that started turning Indians into independencists.

Our independence was granted by the Anglos because of domestic politics and American pressure, . Gandhi did not do shit. Except get many dumb r-slurs injured/killed obeying him and his 'tardation.

Classic yank meddling, broke the buck that was the bong's empire piece by piece.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.