First and foremost, there's a list of evil bullies, which is coincidentally a list of insane ideologues
The immediate casus belli here is that a former book review editor turned opinion writer did a transphobia in the NYT.
You need to be logged in (this will be a theme), but here's a big post. You know exactly what the replies are like:
Bouie wrote about how trans genocide is bad and trans people decided to get mad at him for working for Transmisia Inc. Typical reaction to him blocking someone:
There's a million sad posts like:
Some people are happy with themselves tho
Or conflicted:
100 percent this
This is super scattered but ~everyone is using this as an opportunity to get sad about bullies and have a meta-chat about the platform, so search around:
P.S. this is probably a nothingburger, reports are in that he deactivated for normal reasons:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jack deserves this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Funnily enough, they bullied Jack off a few months ago![:chudspingenocide:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/chudspin.webp)
Jack did get quite butthurt about how "common" people took away his chud paradise
And of course this is a great and honourable event
!codecels remember to never let anyone capable of maintaining eye contact anywhere near your pet projects
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao what a weasely article that exemplifies the merger between peak corporate doublespeak and leftoid cries for maximal censorship and control.
It's funny how the "paradox of tolerance" concept was taken by libs/leftoids to mean they should just immediately censor and lock down any platform they can get their hands on. Especially in the context of them celebrating Dorsey being kicked off for not pissing and pooping his pants over Elongated MusKKKrat 24/7, cause him being a dumb little centrist in the first place that wanted to tolerate the dumbass Twitterfugees was the reason he got ousted. The Paradox of Tolerance is about not tolerating people who seek to destroy and subvert platforms for free speech and open discussion in the first place, instead of being about maximizing censorship to protect le marginalized voices and shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They love the paradox of tolerance but never post the full excerpt.
Specifically, they always leave out the bit where Popper actually defines "intolerance" as "those who begin by denouncing all argument, and meeting words with pistols and fists"![:marseythinkorino: :marseythinkorino:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseythinkorino.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I love that you just can't go anywhere popular on the internet without r-slurs pooping it up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Specifically of the AGP variety
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In this case it appealed to neurodivergent wingcucks, who are either rightoids turbochuds or AGP lunatics. Both will shit up a website incredibly fast.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context