https://old.reddit.com/r/e621/comments/1e1wjoc/e621_bans_explicit_young_humanlikes/
(e621.net is essentially a porn site that primarily caters to furries, but isn't limited to them)
Some users are confused at the seeming hypocrisy of the ban:
Why banned explicit posts with young humans and humanoid creatures but still allowed explicit posts with cubs? (cubs referring to very young furry characters)
Others think it's time to jump ship:
This sucks, we need a new loli page
And other such miscellaneous grieving:
User sad that lots of Nintendo characters were hit by the ban
Well, mostly:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if your argument starts with "technically it's not real child porn" you've already lost
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You know, I thought loli artists were kind of based for exercising their mildly degenerate form of self expression when I thought loli shit was just lewd megumin art. But then I learned about toddler con and now I think they all belong in the chipper.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Please choose one of the following as a thought experiment
goon cave plastered with toddlercon guro
r*ped and murdered IRL actual toddler
Which is better?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Option three:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
(fails to respond)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the later is morally worse but both are beyond the pale in civil society
Follower of Christ
Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah tbh if I were at the point of having a toddler con good cave I'd probably just rope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The second cause the toddler probably dressed in a provicative manner (diapers etc) and thus wanted it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
(fails to respond)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
When they say "technically not cp" you respond with "Fine. Art depicting children drawn by p-dophiles for p-dophiles."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
If I watch gay hentai I'm gay
If I watch scat porn I'm probably Indian
But no uhh actually people who watch animated CP aren't pedos chud the kids aren't real.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's such bullshit. Watching beastiality porn doesn't make me a white woman.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I think they already lost just by being furries in the first place
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context