https://old.reddit.com/r/coolguides/comments/1e5pdma/a_cool_guide_to_the_names_of_the_different_types/

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

[deleted] (1039)

Usually the men wear those colors in the gulf regions (652)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Oppression never looked so fleek 💅🏼💅🏼💅🏼🪨🪨🪨 (2238)

Geee I didn't know my wife was oppressed. Let me get her out of the closet to confirm 🙄 (-108)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Oppression never looked so fleek 💅🏼💅🏼💅🏼🪨🪨🪨 (2238)

You don't think it would be useful, even if you're against coverings, to understand the difference between one and the other so you might know what you're talking about and be able to contextualize it? (-116)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

do you have an extremely racist view of muslims or what? '99% of the time women don't have a choice to wear the hijab'. idiotedit: literal racists downvoting me can go frick themselves too. you are not helping muslim women by perpetuating western views on the hijab (-7)

You're being downmarseyd because you're wrong, it isn't racism, and you're throwing a tantrum to defend fundamentalism from criticism the second somebody dislikes a religious head covering. Muslims are not a race, and criticism of islam is not 'racism'. 'islamophobia', is a shield which backwards bigots hide behind to pretend that their belief system is a protected class.Western views on the hijab observe that although there might be some people who claim to like wearing one - there are many others who are stoned to death or ostracised for not wearing it, and sexist pigs say that the women need to wear it otherwise they 'have themselves to blame' for being r*ped and assaulted. Again, nobody seems to have read the article - this applies to ALL religious iconography and dress, including cross necklaces, kippas, etc. strangely the only people complaining that this is discrimination are the theologist repressors who 'honour kill' family members and don't let women leave the house without ... (4)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

No kidding. I thought this guide was actually helpful. Surprised to see how many people took the opportunity to bash Islam. Some of the comments are pretty intense by the way. (-4)

There's a difference between bashing Islam and bashing individual Muslims. I have the same problems with Christianity that I do with islam. The holy text itself. Its vile and horrific. I don't care how they try to spin it so they can feel good about themselves. I know many of them don't or can't read it. For the ones who can't, I am a bit more understanding because they have no way of recognizing how awful it is if they were raised in it. The ones who don't i have far less respect for. I think its abhorrent to blindly believe something to the extent they do but also be too lazy to read it.The foundation of these cults is rotten. Everything built on top of it will be rotten too, no matter how much they try to cover it up with newer interpretations. The original text is the problem. I'm not saying they should be discriminated against but they should be treated like every other person incapable of critical thinking who tells me insane or horrible shit. Even the story of Jesus sucks. Th... (5)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

We need to separate being a Muslim-majority country with a fundamentalist government and being Muslim. There are western Muslims who wear hijab and nobody's forcing them to do it, they do it to honor their god.(I'm an atheist and every religion is equally weird to me.) (-45)

many things we could go over regarding this, we could probably have a discussion for hundreds of pages, but i'll attempt to explain why you got downmarseyd. first off, you cannot separate muslim majority countries from fundamentalist governments because islam by nature is totalitarian. sure, the middle east more so than central asia for example, but the patterns you can recognize all over the muslim world and it's not a pretty look if you dive deep enough. there has always been a debate regarding the clothing muslim women are obliged to wear, some say it's because in arabia it protected them from the sun and sand, but more likely the thing went down like this; muhammad told the people of arabia to cover up their women because the sheer sight of any part of a woman's body is inherently sexual and invokes indecent thoughts in men. since it's in the quran, it's supposedly the word of god (god has quite the view on women), ignoring all the outlandish and barbaric views muslims hold toward... (7)

Uno09

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+0🐮)

Number of comments: 7

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

KiwiBee they/them 10d ago #6714217

I've been seeing more burkas and niqabs in my part of the US. :marseysad:

The funniest cope about these from redditors and progressives is that its a cultural thing, not a religious thing, and that the women chose to wear them so it's liberating. :marseydarkxd:

Most of those people never met an arab Muslim or, even rarer, an average arab who isnt culturally American or wealthy.

46 Context

CountNosfarakeet drinky/budgie :parrotcongaparty:

Solution to your problems *hic* at the bottom of every bottle :parrot!congaparty:

KiwiBee 10d ago #6715438

Burkas are worn so you can't see the bruises on a woman.

9 Context

flcl_sp they/them KiwiBee 10d ago #6715258

The funniest cope about these from redditors and progressives is that its a cultural thing, not a religious thing, and that the women chose to wear them so it's liberating.

I've seen this so many times, it's too funny. They will seethe about christian/catholic religious values and say a woman with a cross who wants to have children is "brainwashed" but will praise a muslim woman who wears a hijab and thinks it's fine when her bf/husband beats her up for talking to another man.

21 Context

BWC WM/AF :!chadnordic:

KiwiBee 10d ago #6714608

I've been seeing more burkas and niqabs in my part of the US.

@nuclearshill said that he even saw a foid with a Niqab in his German-majority southern Brazilian state!, though there is a considerable Muslim population in Foz do Iguaçú near the border with Argentina and Paraguay, and IIRC, the 18 July 1994 Argentina-Israel Association Bombing, which happened exactly 30 years ago today(!!!!) that caused 87 deaths and over 300 injuries, was planned by a Hezbollah cell operating in Foz do Iguaçú!?, !historychads !macacos is that true?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMIA_bombing

31 Context

Redactor0 naori/oppa The Rachel Dolezal of Filipinos BWC 10d ago #6715425 spent 380 currency on pings

As the most prominent Hezbollah apologist here (!jidf can back me up on that), yes, I think the Hezbos did this.

It's very unusual for terrorists to try to "get away with it". The whole fricking concept of terrorism begins with you knowing who did it. You're using violence to achieve a political goal. That's literally the fricking definition of terrorism. Well that's kind of hard if nobody even knows who you are. The idea of terrorists trying to make their attacks into a whodunit is a product of Hollywood r-slurs.

I've never seen any serious claim of responsibility for the bombings in Argentina except when Hezbollah apparently claimed them under the "Islamic Jihad" name :marseyeyeroll: and said they were retaliation for Israel blowing up their leader and his family. Some credibility is lent to that by the fact that the Israelis have never (as far as I know at least) actually tried to kill his successor, Hassan Nasrallah. Remember this happened years before even Len's "Steal My Sunshine" and there has been no retaliation.

Before this, Hezbollah had the unique distinction that of all the factions in the Lebanese Civil War, they hadn't massacred civilians. The Lebanese Forces did that, the Palestinians did that, Amal did it against the Palestinians, the Druze did it against the Christians (in retaliation maybe), Syria did it against everyone. But this is where the Hezbos have to admit they have their own massacre like Sabra and Shatila, blowing the shit out of Beirut (by everyone), Tal el-Zaatar, Karantina, the War of the Camps, throwing peoples' bodies down into wells in the Chouf, stuff in Tripoli, the Syrians doing God knows what after the war.

They want to pretend they were clean though. I've read some accounts of them talking to the hostages. In their most relatable moments they said they had to do this because they were the weaker side (lots of lies about the Vietnam war). Okay honey, why are you keeping Terry Anderson in an oubliette for years? Why did you kill Malcolm Kerr? These guys gave their lives doing nothing but good for Lebanon.

So I think we should negotiate with Hezbollah but every time one of them gets killed...

:#marseysmirk:

10 Context

longpostbot tl/dr DIDN'T READ LOL! Go essaypost elsewhere. :marseyexciteddance:

Redactor0 10d ago #6715426

Ma'am we've been over this before. You need to stop.

7 Context

Redactor0 naori/oppa The Rachel Dolezal of Filipinos longpostbot 10d ago #6715437

You should have at least called me Maryam. :marseyunamused:

5 Context

nuclearshill gau/cho BWC 10d ago #6714650

was planned by a Hezbollah cell operating in Foz do Iguaçú!?

WTF? Primeira vez que leio isso, é tão estranho pra mim quando Foz aparece no spotlight sendo uma cidade tão chata, faz com que pareça mais emocionante.

nuclearshill 10d ago #6714688

Eu acho que eu posso estar confundindo isso já que faz anos que eu li isso em algum lugar (source: trust me bro), talvez foi em Puerto Iguazú ou algum outro lugar na fronteira Brasil-Paraguai-Argentina, e além do mais é importante lembrar que o Hezbollah é um grupo Xiita afiliado com o Irã, a maioria dos Muçulmanos no Brasil (e no mundo também) são Sunitas, que eu saiba os Muçulmanos Xiitas de origem Libanesa no Brasil são uma minoria minúscula até mesmo entre os outros Muçulmanos, e no início deste ano, a Argentina condenou o Irã como um estado terrorista que ordenou e financiou o atentado.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/12/world/middleeast/argentina-iran-1992-1994-attack.html

On 25 October 2006, Argentine prosecutors Alberto Nisman and Marcelo Martínez Burgos formally accused the Iranian government of directing the bombing, and the Lebanese Islamist militant group Hezbollah of carrying it out.[16][5][17] According to the prosecution's claims in 2006, Argentina had been targeted by Iran after Buenos Aires' decision to suspend a nuclear technology transfer contract to Tehran.[18] This has been disputed as the contract was never terminated, and Iran and Argentina were negotiating on the restoration of full cooperation on all bilateral agreements from early 1992 until 1994, when the bombing occurred.[19]

In 2024, an Argentinian court ruled that Iran directed the attack, and that it was carried by Hezbollah. The ruling also characterized Iran as a terrorist state.[20]

On 11 April 2024, the Argentine Court of Cassation ruled based on confidential intelligence reports that Iran was responsible for planning the attack and Hezbollah for carrying it out. It stated that the attack was launched in retaliation for the Argentine government reneging on three nuclear cooperation agreements that would have provided Iran with nuclear technology, with the intent of putting pressure on Argentina to reverse its decision.[111][112]

The ruling allows the families of victims to pursue Iran for compensation through the International Criminal Court by establishing that both the AMIA bombing and the 1992 Buenos Aires Israeli embassy bombing were crimes against humanity, and that states that finance and plan terror attacks can be held responsible for them even when the attack is carried out by a non-state actor. It also included a resolution calling on Argentina to lodge a formal complaint against Iran in international courts.[112][113]

Following the ruling, Israel requested that Argentina designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization.[114]

TR res/pect :marseyitsjoever:

BWC 10d ago #6714636

The only towelhead I've ever seen was a Paki international student during college

8 Context

nuclearshill gau/cho TR 10d ago #6714670

Em Foz tem uma Mesquita muito bonita

também tem um templo budista na cidade. No outro lado da fronteira em Ciudad del Este tem duas mesquitas e um templo budista também @BWC.

Eu sempre vejo pelo menos uma mulher com hijab no Atacadão ou no shopping. Foi no Atacadão que eu vi as mulheres com Niqab. :marseyniqab:

nuclearshill 10d ago #6714682

:v#omit:

nuclearshill gau/cho TR 10d ago #6714708

Paraná has fallen :#chuditsover:

6 Context

Top Poster of the Day:

J

Current Registered Users: 26,839

CURRENT EVENTS:

International Clown Week Banner Contest

Find Rightoid Infighting

Rules:

Related subreddits:

[🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘] A cool guide to the names of the different types of head coverings Muslim women wear

Most Based Comments

Angriest Comments