Reported by:

Leftoids cannot understand why a nation would want to use their limited water supply to make semiconductors instead of growing rice

https://twitter.com/rahll/status/1815481828008141212
82
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Leftoids seethe when people like me say this about nuts in California (versus crops that produce more pounds but fewer dollars per gallon of water). Same issue, except there is not even a national security angle to the question of crops in CA.

Wingcucks and the unquestioning pursuit of policies that are only superficially sensical: an iconic duo. !grillers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If California stops growing almonds like leftoids want 80% of all almonds worldwide would disappear. 100% of America's almonds supply. Say goodbye to almond joys and anything else

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why can't you grow almonds in East Texas or Missisipi where there's unlimited water?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Mediterranean climate of wet winters with dry summers is perfect. With some of the most developed infrastructure for water supply, the Central Valley is able to completely control how much crops get hydrated in a way few places can't. This turns the weakness of California's water situation into a positive, though has some consequences.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He won't answer this bb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh no whatever will we do without almonds

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They also grow rice in California which is fricking r-slurred and Cajunphobic

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

California is such an unbelievably r-slurred state. They should axe all the water-intensive agriculture

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

California has primo agricultural land but they waste it for the most random shit

:#marseydarkxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Avocados help make the HR and yoga instructor world go around.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We obviously should be growing corn and soybeans instead

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You create an import dependency for a resource you cannot do without which is bad.

The only reason throwing away water availability from a local source makes sense is if you are using it to secure something else even more important like national security through chip manufacturing.

There is a reason energy independence is a geopolitical concept. At home always beats from outside when you want to remain independent.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I already called out this topic:

Same issue, except there is not even a national security angle to the question of crops in CA.

In the case of CA, it would not be a national security issue to have a less-varied but nutritional diet if America got cut off from imports. Many things would just move production to other states, though.

Taiwan is potentially risking self-sustainability for food, but it's probably worthwhile for the comparative revenue.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just to clarify, are you saying that California should or should not ban the use of water for heavily water dependent crops to increase the amount of local water availability?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What import dependency? If push comes to shove they just go back to rice farming. It's not like the farms rust without use or that the land is being destroyed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It takes 105 to 180 days to grow rice.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fortunately there are things called strategic stores which can store rice to cover these 105-180 days in case of an invasion. Much cheaper to maintain these (note: you can fill them with imported rice too) than dedicating your scarce water to literal rice in peacetime.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just keep a bunch of rice in a building. Call it the national rice reserve. Easy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nice.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Agriculture is like 2% of their economy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, which means the only other concern is what happens if they get isolated by mainland China. As long as they have enough food to handle a reasonably likely contingency, then I totally support diverting it to chips.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm referring to california

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tbf, aren't most leftoids (or at least all the eco-friendly hippie-types, either genuine or for show) angry at the amount of almonds/pistachios grown in Cali too?

Cuz, you know...it uses up a lot of water (which ain't so common out there) for crops that iirc get shipped internationally (often to china) or something...and this is all largely due to Big Ag policies that allows them to have so much land/water...

idk :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tbf, aren't most leftoids (or at least all the eco-friendly hippie-types, either genuine or for show) angry at the amount of almonds/pistachios grown in Cali too?

Yes, which is exactly what I'm saying.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ahhhh...my bad :marseygigaretard:

…tho admittedly, almond/pistachio crops are a bit more of a luxury than a necessity compared to corn and wheat so I guess it's not as a big deal if they don't prioritize them (even though i won't be reccomedning people to endlessly chop these nut trees like so many people would like to)...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.