Remember when the famously pro-Trump media of 2015 forced Clinton out of the Presidential race? Anyone... anyone? :marseycricket:

https://twitter.com/whstancil/status/1816084293434966322

Literally anyone critical of the candidate is definitely in a wide-reaching conspiracy to oust him for someone who is going to be nearly identical politically

:marseysmoothbraintalking#:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

38
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Clinton actually got more negstive coverage than trump did in 2016 according to most of the papers on media coverage during 2016. At point nyt had written over 40 email articles in a week.

https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/news-coverage-2016-general-election-how-press-failed-voters#:~:text=But%20over%20the%20full%20course,negative%20to%2044%20percent%20positive.

The media is ever on a quest to see non-biased for poorly educated rurals and often swing way too far in the wrong direction.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trump's coverage during the general election was more negative than Clinton's, running 77 percent negative to 23 percent positive.

:marseyoctopus2#:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Read the next part pal

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"no but they was super mean during the primaries, trust me"

:marseyoutried#:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You might be an actual r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I had eyes and ears, lol. I was alive.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ah yes, because you couldnt at all suffer from confirmation bias.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Probably the same amount as someone writing "News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters" right after Hillary lost the election. There would never be any bias or seething individuals writing social science journals.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The website uses objective data, thats why we use data like this, to avoid confirmation bias.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Pizza, when's your next feetcast? :daydream:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The public must know

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.