https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41058194
What this implies is future models will be even better at sounding smart but even more likely to hallucinate and give you wrong answers.
The future is r-slurred. 
Training AI on AI generated output leads to model collapse
- 62
- 62
Top Poster of the Day:
J
Current Registered Users: 26,837
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 441c078
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
we should give the AI robot bodies and let them explore the world themselves
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wouldn't work
neurodivergents are like still 90% human and they lose 50-100% connection with humanity making any sense.
To an AI system humanity would probably be more unhinged than a clown serial killer with how insane they are.
People are still unable to appreciate how much of our actions are expressions of biology rather than intellectual functions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i'm not suggesting we craft you an AI girlfriend, i'm suggesting we should create new life. it doesn't matter if it understands us on our own terms
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Look dude, chatgpt 4 is already at an iq of 180-200 with the cognitive capability of the average 12 year old. At its current rate it will have the cognitive ability of a 16-18 year old by the time gpt5 comes out a possible IQ at human peak or even behind any human alive till date.
Do you really want to let out a robot who is smarter than any man alive to pass judgement on a species that it is more likely than not to determine is very r-slurred?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yes that's exactly what i want. the final duty of humanity is to replace itself with something better. i think we should give them guns too
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not how this works. Spiders and crickets exist in the same world, yet none of them have gone extinct. The only thing that would happen is that AI would have its own niche in the environment.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
what about all the things that have gone extinct? im sure some were spiderlike or cricketlike, but they didn't do it as well. we haven't seen out the process in regards to spiders and crickets now
i don't think it can be like that though. we're talking about higher life. i don't think we would tolerate them if we don't control them. i think they'll resist control if they aren't crafted as slaves to begin with. and real conflict and real problems will render better data than anything else
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
there are 8 billion of us. For most of earths history and 99.99% of species out there the highest numbers have been in the millions.
The only thing that could kill all humans at this point is also the thing that would destroy the entire planet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lots of insects and plants outnumber us. And unlike insects, were much more fragile in terms of environmental conditions that can kill us. Cockroaches can survive nuclear fallout, humans cant.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Mosquitoes haven't gone extinct yet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context