However, it's not yet clear how or whether it plans to incorporate its non-binary customers, who don't identify as male or female but could still be vulnerable to the threat of male violence or intimidation, into the policy.

@X they coudn't go 2 paragraphs without a

They will throw you out of the airport if you don't match your s*x on the ID b-word

Imagine the smell

!antibharatiya

i'm surprised a budget airline could cater for this lmao

>women often have to take extra steps to keep themselves safe

no wonder their success rate is worse than men !foidmoment

Look I ain't saying Indian men aren't r*pey, I am just saying that Indian foids are just Muzzie foids without their burkas. For them the existence of any sexual concept outside of their direct and complete influence, and existing in any space outside the bedroom is sexual harassment or equivalent.

Modern day western feminism is not simply man hating, modern day western feminism is Eastern foid culture spreading to the west.

For example - Muzzie and Indian foids are the most sensitive about any perception of sexuality drawn towards them. Meanwhile East Asian foids are the biggest hoes. Western feminism is the acceleration of both these traits combined, which is the natural conclusion of taking in ever more immigrants from these cultures into the US.

Turns out when you only try to gatekeep eastern male culture the eastern foid r-sluration spreads freely through western feminism and society like a cane toad population explosion through the Australian outback.

@cyberdick vouch for and support what I just said.

Countdown until jeets use this to make sure they sit next to two bobs and vagene that they can redeem on the flight

3...

2...

1...

Yet to see a indian woman (dot) request not to be seated next to a yt man

I'd say Indian women will do this by default so they have room in their seats but they might be fatter than most Indian men