Reported by:

Looks like gavin is running in 2028

https://twitter.com/gavinnewsom/status/1816497533772038507
76
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Alright, Gavin is finally becoming (somewhat) based and cool and redpilled and all that jazz!

...is he really though? Well, I doubt it, but hey it's a first step soooooo

:mar#seyclapping:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's pushed back on a lot of trans stuff such as trans kids in sports and minors being able to overrule parents. Me personally I think he's trying to Macronmax :macroncool:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neighbor what? He's at the forefront of that shit. Where are you getting your info?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

in this one he's on the pro-:marseytrain2: side tho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also found this: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/10/gov-gavin-newsom-vetoes-3-pro-lgbtq-bills-after-signing-several-into-law-in-september/

It seems clear to me he's taking a nuanced approach, which is probably the best option for him politically if he wants a chance. I think the AIPAC knocked some sense into him, and he's realized if he reigns in the cities and clean up California while having a nuanced, middle of the road identity politics position, he can very well become president. And that's what he's been doing. He obviously has faults, he's a scumbag who rewards political allies like Panera or PG&E, but he's been a smart scumbag lately. I like him more now than I used to.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Never even read the title. But tbh, I don't really care one way or another on this specific :marseytrain: issue. Rather they tell a counselor (probable p-dophile) about these issues than just their fellow groomercord :!marseytrain:s (definite p-dophiles). Now what these counselors do is another issue, and that's where my issues are.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Huh. Surprising, but also entirely out of character for him.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If teachers thought this children were at risk by chud parents, shouldn't they have already reported these parents?

"Let's keep this secret from your parents" has terrible optics

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Honestly, I wish that we could get a sane anti-:marseytrain: candidate who doesn't drink all of the crazy far-right Kool-Aid. Where's the J.K. Rowling equivalent to vote for? :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysigh:

you and me both

>leftoid party in britain drops :marseytrain: shit

>wins in a landslide

idk why other parties cant see this winning formula

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.