Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • Sal : Too many words brain hurty
  • InterGONEvention : Just me. Rent free in your head and in your reports.

:marseylongpost: words inside Because rightoids enjoy abusing awards to protect themselves from getting dunked I'll respond to them in 1 post.

The other day @Intervention posted something along the lines of "I remember when the gays were accusing Fauci of killing them."

This was in the context of some r drama conservatards (intervention literally being from r/conservative, the most r-slurred sub on reddit) trying to claim Fauci somehow failed to respond to the HIV epidemic.

The problem being, of course, is it wasn't Fauci, the CDC, or the NIH that failed. It was the Republican party and Ronald Reagan. It's not even remotely shocking intervention is unaware of this because she's a poorly educated moron and perpetually wrong about everything, but still.

Intervention, after another rightoid gave me an award to prevent me from dunking him, responded with this:

STFU wacko. I was alive to remember it and it's easily searchable.

Indeed b-word, it is easily searchable, and had you done so you'd have found this:

https://academic.oup.com/shm/article/33/3/1001/5265310

during the 1970s; by 1979, health professionals began to recognise an epidemic.9 In June 1981, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published the first official US report on the new disease. Over the following months, AIDS took a swift and devastating toll on urban gay communities, with the hundreds of cases diagnosed that year representing only a tiny fraction of those already infected.10 However, the political climate deterred any proactive federal response. In keeping with his agenda of trimming federal government, the new president, Ronald Reagan, had cut budgets at the NIH and CDC. The social conservatives who helped elect him recoiled from a disease publicly associated with gay menβ€”a strongly marginalised and stigmatised social group.11 Federal agency leaders expressed mounting frustrations over the next several years, as the administration blocked congressional appropriations for AIDS-related programmes and impeded the CDC’s attempts to mount prevention campaigns. Medical research at the NIH was relatively less affected by government recalcitrance, but for those already infected or at risk of contracting HIV little federal help was forthcoming. In 1983, activists succeeded in having AIDS designated a disability under Medicaidβ€”but most AIDS patients died before receiving any benefits.

This is a common tactic you see Republicans engage in - they fail to respond to or block a government response to a serious issue, and then years later try to spin the failed response on other people - in this case Fauci.

In 30 years you can be sure the failed covid response will not be Donald Trump, but everyone else, just like somehow Fauci is to blame for Reagan failing to respond to HIV.

The lesson here, you dumb b-word, is that just because you lived through something doesn't mean you have any idea what you're talking about.

Anyone blaming Fauci for a failed HIV response is objectively fricking wrong and warping history.

R-slur #2.

@aydyn

Yeah, moron, not only do people act as projectiles inside the vehicle when unbelted, you can easily be flung out into traffic and cause more accidents:

https://clickorlando.com/traffic/2020/12/07/fatal-crash-closes-i-4-in-osceola-county/

https://mercedsunstar.com/news/local/article254906857.html

There's way more here, but it isn't actually worth trying to argue with people claiming seatbelt laws are tyranny or that they only protect the individual.

62
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

38K deaths a year in the U.S. due to traffic accidents and you pull two that don't even prove your point lmfaoooo

So there's no ambiguity whatsoever, let's quote what you originally said:

"And you aren't really only hurting yourself, when you go flying out of your car you can easily hit others and harm them." [sic]

Except the people in your examples don't hurt other people... lol.

How mad do you have to be to spend that much effort only to prove you're an idiot.

:brainletcaved:

PS: Disagreeing with you doesn't make someone a rightoid, idiot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can absolutely cause traffic accidents you 70 IQ community college drop-out.

You are a mongoloid.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So find an actual example of it then lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, because I don't feel like sorting through 500 law pages. Basic common sense should tell you being thrown into oncoming traffic can cause more accidents.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Then cite one lmao. You are so unbelievably stupid.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not going to dig through 500 law blogs to prove to a mongoloid that basic common sense exists.

Now stop responding to me and go be a 70 IQ mongoloid somewhere else.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thats because you cant find one, but you sure did try. Nice try moron.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No I didn't even try, I just know there's going to be 500 law blogs talking about it.

Either way, common sense exists no matter what. You are low IQ.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol "common sense" is the saddest retreat I've seen from you. I suggest if you realize you're wrong you could pivot to some obscure Wikipedia article or giant tome no one will read.

I know you would never concede a point, but usually you do better than this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not going to prove to some r-slurred soy that the sky is blue.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.