https://old.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1fclmw0/almost_half_of_doctors_have_been_sexually/?sort=top
- 50
- 102
Top Poster of the Day:
Sasanka_of_Gauda
Current Registered Users: 27,806
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads HOLES PING GROUPSCURRENT EVENTS:
KHive Fortification
Create banners and sidebars, badges and coins abound!Find Rightoid Infighting
500 mbux per post, no limitDrama: any incident, scene, gaffe, rumor, opinion, or disagreement that is blown entirely out of proportion.
Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.
Rules:
- Asking to see who saved comments/posts=1 day ban
- You must be 18 or older to view this site.
- NO RIGHTWING AGENDAPOSTING.
- Discord users will be banned on sight.
- Don't post anything illegal.
- No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
- No doxxing.
- Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
- Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
- Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
- Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
- Absolutely NO misgendering.
- Absolutely NO antisemitism.
- Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
- You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
- You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
- You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
- You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
- This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever.
Related subreddits:
πππ«π© π°π¨π³ ππ«π
Live commit: bc50dec
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because the peer review process is a joke and countless shit studies get thru it every year.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I wish people would jump to my involuntary erections
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I am 95% sure your peepee is not getting hard. Go consult a doctor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wait! Are you saying the
clergyscientists are just making stuff up? Are they interpreting thescripturesdata to line up with their goals and ideals? I think youre starting to sound like ahereticanti-intellectual.Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They've run studies on it and reviewers seem to basically just check to see if it's cited correctly and move on. Not actually checking what was cited
https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
For authors, very possible. Reviewers are just lazy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context