Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i believe this is entirely your fault as the parent. it would have been much safer to not introduce your child to the internet at this scale... especially at 3 years old. wait until they have developed some sort of sense to do things by themself before you let them run free with unrestricted internet access.


This is shitty parenting lol

:marseytruthnuke#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I will not let my kid [interact with strangers unsupervised] is such basic parenting

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

butt how will they learn about other cultures at :marseywait: age 3?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is almost definitely fake but

My son is three years old, and we've been trying to potty train him for a while now.

My kid was 90% potty trained the day he turned 2. Might be other issues going on here...

I don't want to say the parents are just lazy but, the parents are probably just lazy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Apparently there are a lot of parents these days who try to send their kids to pre-k without being potty trained

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gross.

But I an hearing that a bit. The preschool my kid went to told us he needed to be potty trained before they would admit him. They wouldn't have mentioned it if they didn't need to deal with the issue at least semi-regularly.

:#marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It really depends on the kid, #1 did it around 2 mostly but was well over 3 before he was consistent and could hold it over night. #2 basically refused till she was about 3 then was fully trained in like a month once ready. #3 basically refused to shit in the potty till he was 4 to the point he'd plug himself up. I'm honestly not going to even bother starting with #4 and #5 till they're able to sit on the real potty. Frick all that little potty stuff this time around, I'm not having a fancy bucket for shit sitting in my house again.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the kid should be more afraid of the father than :marseyskibiditoilet:

https://media.tenor.com/E4GCGwyVCGEAAAAx/boondocks-granddad.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyoctopus4:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>You might be wondering what a "skibidi potty" is, and honestly, I had no idea either until we encountered

So you have absolutely no idea what your three year old is watching on the internet :marseyyikes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Alphoomers :marseyeyeroll:

Just tape the little fricker to potty until he stops crying. Eventually he'll realise.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I get my parenting advice from random rdrama comments

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tell him that it's okay to be scared, but a brave cameraman must face up to the pottys eventually. Also point out that the Alliance joined up with the Skibidi Pottys to fight the Astro Pottys in episode 75, so the potty is most likely friendly (assuming it's not an Astro potty).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What he just said is false. What happened to Ruqqus is utterly incompetent, ungrateful, and condescending leadership. Literally, all these guys can do is code - no other function.

captainmeta4 cannot talk to Ruqqus userbase about anything other than an update without insulting them. He has none of the skills of a leader, ceo, or frontman. He's the kind of guy that needs to be hidden away, locked in an office, and prevented from ever interacting with the public because he simply cannot. Yet, he was leading the show - he was telling users "your opinions don't matter," he was appointing himself guildmaster and changing guild settings, he was banning people from official Ruqqus guilds because he didn't like their on-topic posts.

kek is a follower poorly imitating what he's read in tech magazines and journals. He is young and unable to acknowledge captainmeta4's poor leadership or synthesize what it means.

Arkitect has been MIA almost the entire time, but I suspect he just goes along with whatever it is captainmeta4 is doing.

All of them completely and utterly refuse to acknowledge the role they played and the ultimate responsibility they bare for the events that led to the failure of Ruqqus as a social media platform. They did this every step of the way and they still do it. They will make excuses that look like they were ripped from poorly written press statements, they will blame their early adopting userbase, they will lie. But, Ruqqus failed this early on - despite initial excitement - for no reason other than how they behaved and the choices they made.

That, in a nutshell is what killed Ruqqus, but more specifically, there's this;

The admins were only interested in suggestions and feedback from a relatively small group of Ruqqus Groomercord users. These users differ/differed significantly from the average Ruqqus user and actively despised them. They would antagonize Ruqqus users via brigading, guild seiging, general harassment, and "feature" and policy suggestions that you'd think would be very questionable on their face - but, apparently not to Ruqqus admins. As you'd hopefully not expect, Ruqqus admins enabled this behavior by refusing to address brigading entirely, preemptively telling Ruqqus Groomercord about the bans of guildmasters (which enabled Ruqqus Groomercord members to seige and subvert entire communities before actual members of the guild could do anything about it), allowing and partaking in the harassment and name-calling of users they didn't like, and implementing "features" and policies that were counter to their initial "free speech" and "if it's legal, it's allowed" premises. Yet, when users reacted, the admins shit on them harder and told them it was their fault.

The admins outright refused to accept their niche, they thought they could compete with Reddit on apolitical content, and they refused to market Ruqqus at all (primarily because carpathianflorist said marketing Ruqqus and/or trying to get more people to hear about it was stupid). But, it makes sense, right? You yourselves are allegedly right-wingers and you have a right-wing niche, so it might be productive to at least try to make Ruqqus known to other right-wingers (the people it already appeals to and who are actively looking for a place to go because of ban waves) via sharing about it on right-wing forums, the comment sections of right-wing youtubers and podcasters, you might even try to get some personalities to mention your new social media platform, right? But, no. The admins were oddly obsessed with keeping right-wingers off the site, "containing" their current userbase, and "getting more left-wing and apolitical content" (which would've come naturally with more users in general) - they were obsessed with making another Reddit "but without censorship." And for whatever reason, they thought carpathianflorist - openly authoritarian left-winger and "drama connoisseur" was the guy to listen to.

Now, Ruqqus was created as a reaction to the massing banning of right-wing and anti-woke communities on Reddit and so, that's who predominantly came to Ruqqus. Yet, the majority of the Ruqqus Groomercord users who had any meaningful say or rapport with the admins were left-wing (especially the leader, carpathianflorist) or "i-wanna-be-nice" type republicans; literally liquid food for thought.

They don't want to talk about it and keep making up excuses because they look stupid for the whole thing.

Snapshots:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Parenting/comments/154l5qk/my_son_is_too_scared_of_the_skibidi_potty_to/:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Welcome to Crocodile Isle (DKC2).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.