Nooooooo you cant cancel high risk policies just eat the billions in loses :soycry:

https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1877767605714382914
23
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it would be better if California fulfilled their duty of protecting homes from burning down

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

sorry sweaty the cute butch fire chief doesn't have time in her busy schedule to do that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good idea! But first lets do a decade long environmental impact survey :marseynotes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Easy: rich champagne liberals have an enormous carbon footprint. I'll let you work out the conclusion.

TRANS LIVES MATTER

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>CONCLUSION

we should kill them

:whitesickotalking#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Based, I support anything that inconveniences insurance companies

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seems reasonable for just one year, but is still a massive L, because you're giving responsible citizens some time to get their affairs in order to leave.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sure it helps people, but it just adds even more justification to pull out of California if the government is just gonna start forcing you to insure risky properties

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Depends on the details I suppose, but it sounds like withdrawing insurance before renewal, which is shitty and shitty. The renewal is so-so, but they can raise rates and cover a shorter time period as long as other Cali laws don't frick them on that.

If it's insurance companies seeing it as cheaper to break contract and get sued than just pay out, govment in any state should frick them, r*pe them, and take all their shit, because they were gambling against this as much as any one of their customers were gambling for it by paying for insurance.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the insurers who still held these policies are r-slurred anyway and deserve the L

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: DK's Treehouse (DK64).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.