BREAKING: California has banned insurers from canceling or not renewing residential property policies in the Los Angeles neighborhoods that were affected by the massive wildfires across the city. This ban is in place for one year.
— More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) January 10, 2025
Nooooooo you cant cancel high risk policies just eat the billions in loses
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1877767605714382914
- 13
- 23
Now playing: DK's Treehouse (DK64).mp3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think it would be better if California fulfilled their duty of protecting homes from burning down
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
sorry sweaty the cute butch fire chief doesn't have time in her busy schedule to do that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Good idea! But first lets do a decade long environmental impact survey
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Easy: rich champagne liberals have an enormous carbon footprint. I'll let you work out the conclusion.
TRANS LIVES MATTER
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
we should kill them
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Hey sexy, why are you posting so quickly? π You almost forgot to include
Trans lives matter
in your comment π. Slowww down and remember to postTrans lives matter
next time π if that doesn't make sense stop by sometime and we can talk about it for a while π₯΅Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Based, I support anything that inconveniences insurance companies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Seems reasonable for just one year, but is still a massive L, because you're giving responsible citizens some time to get their affairs in order to leave.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sure it helps people, but it just adds even more justification to pull out of California if the government is just gonna start forcing you to insure risky properties
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Depends on the details I suppose, but it sounds like withdrawing insurance before renewal, which is shitty and shitty. The renewal is so-so, but they can raise rates and cover a shorter time period as long as other Cali laws don't frick them on that.
If it's insurance companies seeing it as cheaper to break contract and get sued than just pay out, govment in any state should frick them, r*pe them, and take all their shit, because they were gambling against this as much as any one of their customers were gambling for it by paying for insurance.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the insurers who still held these policies are r-slurred anyway and deserve the L
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1877767605714382914:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context