Maybe the fact checkers seem left-biased because most of the alternative facts emanate from the right. And maybe the need for 24x7 fact checking as an appendage to journ*lism emanated from the deliberate 'flood the zone with shit" strategy of the right.
Like so many other things the first Trump presidency completely broke fact checking. Prior to that they at least made a token effort to be unbiased and you could give them the benefit of the doubt most of the time.
Redactor0naori/oppa
Darklands shill, do not engage
peepeefeet 22d ago#7619626
Edited 22d ago
spent 0 currency on pings
I dunno, there was already some really dumb shit out there. One I remember is them "debunking" the "conspiracy theory" that certain stretches of highways in America were made to be straight so they could be emergency airfields in case of war. And their evidence was just "haha lol that's silly, you can't land a plane on a road". Now I don't know about America, but this has been done a lot around the world.
Take a look at...
Youtube has erased this recently but they used to have a video of a C-5 Galaxy landing on the Autobahn during Reforger in the 1980s. Either erased it or the algorithm has been made r-slurred so that if you include "landing" it shows you every C-5 landing everywhere and if you include "Reforger" it's just ARMA videos. And if you just put in "C-5 Autobahn" it shows you cars.
I guess it's like 1984 where all I can say is that I swear to God I saw this and you just have to trust me.
So most people would start at yes and work their way down. Not from 'Did an official Democrat Twitter account post a specific video?' and go from there.
STOP FRICKING REPORTING SHIT UNLESS IT'S BACKED UP, OH MY FRICKING GROB GOB GLOB GLOD , HOW HARD WOULD IT HAVE BEEN TO GO "hey, maybe we should wait until the details of this study has been released" BUT NO, INSTEAD, GOTTA FRICKING PUSH THIS "NEWS" OUT.
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'd agree with this. It's pretty clear the left realizing that this strategy works so they decided to flood the zone with their own shit.
Now we're all buried in two kinds of shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It`s a good thing that "fact"-checking journopilled lots of people
daily reminder that if 99.5% of journos were sentenced to death humanity would greatly benefit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Like so many other things the first Trump presidency completely broke fact checking. Prior to that they at least made a token effort to be unbiased and you could give them the benefit of the doubt most of the time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Rated: FALSE
There is no evidence that the DRUMPFLER administration suffered from any negative bias in journ*lism.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I dunno, there was already some really dumb shit out there. One I remember is them "debunking" the "conspiracy theory" that certain stretches of highways in America were made to be straight so they could be emergency airfields in case of war. And their evidence was just "haha lol that's silly, you can't land a plane on a road". Now I don't know about America, but this has been done a lot around the world.
Take a look at...
Youtube has erased this recently but they used to have a video of a C-5 Galaxy landing on the Autobahn during Reforger in the 1980s. Either erased it or the algorithm has been made r-slurred so that if you include "landing" it shows you every C-5 landing everywhere and if you include "Reforger" it's just ARMA videos. And if you just put in "C-5 Autobahn" it shows you cars.
I guess it's like 1984 where all I can say is that I swear to God I saw this and you just have to trust me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not a c-5 but close enough
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nice.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Gas chambers for fact checkers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
His dogs were so busy chomping on secret service agents, I'm surprised they had time for a chew toy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Shitty untrained dogs have shitty owners and its EVERYTHING
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Well this one is reasonable. Are you responsible for every last goddarn thing that your daughter posts on social media?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
'Did the dogs do it? Yes.'
So most people would start at yes and work their way down. Not from 'Did an official Democrat Twitter account post a specific video?' and go from there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"Fact-checkers" are fake and straight and exist to uphold certain narratives. If you can't see this or disagree you are also fake and straight.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is that a fact?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bye bye fact checkers, go away forever, maybe keep yourself safe on the way out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
STOP FRICKING REPORTING SHIT UNLESS IT'S BACKED UP, OH MY FRICKING GROB GOB GLOB GLOD , HOW HARD WOULD IT HAVE BEEN TO GO "hey, maybe we should wait until the details of this study has been released" BUT NO, INSTEAD, GOTTA FRICKING PUSH THIS "NEWS" OUT.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH.
Snapshots:
https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-fact-checking:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/fivethirtyeight/comments/1hwqueo/the_rise_and_fall_of_factchecking/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/moderatepolitics/comments/1hzcv16/the_rise_and_fall_of_factchecking/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context