Glormph sanctions Colombia. Here's why this is the end of US global hegemony and we are in the endtimes.

His very basic argument that Guns, Germs and Steel enabled European societies to conquer the world

No it isn't. You're gonna have to actually read the book because various parts of this post are:

• Not relevant to the book.

• Addressed in the book.

• The point that the book is actually trying to make.

And this just doesn't make any sense at all.

By Diamond's shit tier logic Rome never should have collapsed in the west nor Persia in the east.

I can't read your mind to find out what you imagine "Diamond's logic" to be. So we have no common frame of reference to even have a discussion.

It seems you want to talk about why Europe came to be in a dominant in the Old World in the 1800s. Well, this is a pretty old-fashioned choice, but Mahan really has some insightful things to say. Like when he observes that...

Mahan? That guy's an idiot. He was dead wrong when he said that France is destined to defeat England in the end because it's a continental power.

!historychads do you see what I have to deal with here?

Gunpowder was even invented in China and arguable early cannon tactics were really perfected by the Turks.

These are great powers in the Old World with indirect connections with Europe going back millenia. That's not what he was writing about. I mean ffs Turkey is a European country at this time. He was writing about places that had no kind of contact at all with Europeans until they showed up on a ship one day. Places where there's an extreme difference in technology between the invaders and the natives.

Not even joking, I'm having a really hard time following your logic because sometimes you're arguing against the book and sometimes you're against what you imagine is in the book.

Ohhhh I get it. Your imaginary straw man Diamond wrote that once an empire gets guns, germs, and steel then it's pretty much invincible until the 20th century. Yeah, that's really stupid.

China or the Middle Eastern societies. Both had large cities, disease, firearms and access to steel. Both were completely dominated by the European powers up until the end of empire in the 20th century... Gunpowder was even invented in China and arguable early cannon tactics were really perfected by the Turks.

So you're saying straw Diamond is wrong because China and Turkey had guns but they were "completely dominated by the European powers" throughout this period.

(Starting when? I'm assuming you mean 1532 with the Battle of Cajamarca. Silly me. You wouldn't know without reading the book. This whole time I've been assuming we're talking about ~1500-1900. If you'll indulge me, I'm going to continue to. You can have your straw man but you can't move him to a different time period.)

First problem with your argument: Ottoman Turkey was itself a European power. Until a century ago their capital was Adrianople.

Second problem with your argument: China was never "totally dominated" by Europe. That's so stupid I don't need to elaborate further. Turkey hasn't ever been "totally dominated" by Europeans either. If the French and Greeks had gotten their way in the early 1920s maybe you could say that. But they didn't. And it's not even within the time limit you set: "the end of empire in the 20th century". One of the biggest of those empires that ended was the Ottoman Empire.

SHOW MORE

I havent read the book, so I cant speak to whether its r-slurred or not, but I'm with redactor on the fact that most historians are r-slurred and spend more time trying to prove the lessons of history line up with their ideology than just helping the world to actually understand our history.