https://x.com/ianmSC/status/1885114774247399621
A senator yelling that the science can be wrong, but we shouldnβt question it because The Science is settled, perfectly sums up the absurdity of what we dealt with during Covid pic.twitter.com/bEnXt4v3cC
— Ian Miller (@ianmSC) January 30, 2025
IDK what the context is
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No there never was consensus or preponderance of evidence which is why it is self righting as a function of this very process which started to turn tide even at the peak of leftoid political dominance and is so weak it literally took one angry ugly woman to make all
s online collectively piss their panties because they've gotten away with trying to abuse these same arguments without doing any of the actual work which allows it to be easily contradicted unlike hard science stuff like vaccines, nuclear power, evolution etc.
The cass report is definitely also a case of cherrypicking but the fact that was better researched than 99.999% of all garbage studies on
s is a testiment to the fact that this was always some post-modern Sokal affair hoax that literally got out of hand and escaped from a gender study lab in Portland, Oregon.
https://rdrama.net/post/193924/marseydoctortalking-doctors-rise-up-new-marseytrain
https://rdrama.net/post/270363/wpath-phenology-in-shambles-because-of
Yes, like I said, cherrypicking is a million times easier. Thats why people advocate for science based medicine over evidence based medicine because r-slurs call qualitative data about fefes valid despite having mostly shit utility.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
tell that to the American Medical Association
https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-states-stop-interfering-health-care-transgender-children
i feel like your whole point anout cherry picking does more to legitimize my argument that we should be evr questioning, at least we should be asking whether the data coming from the experts at harvard, john hopkins medicine and the VA is cherry picked? I mean theyre certaunly more qualified than me and you, butt does thay mean theyre infallible? I think not. And thats why instead of doing accupuncture I stick to apple cider vinegar colonics.
!slots123
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The American Medical Association is lobbying group for physicians who try to bully all of them into membership but are ultimately just one of countless political lobbying entities. Their credibility has always been shit, just like any single one source. E.g. The Lancet, highly regarded medical journal, lost all cred after people called out the fraudulent study by Andrew Wakefield shill who tried claiming the MMR vax caused colitis which caused autism and attempted to somehow prove this giving little neurodivergent boys unnecessary/pointless colonoscopies and even spinal taps to try and find prove which he didn't.
As a nice result of that though people like you are now aware that most singular sources are not reliable but what you fail to apply is the practicality of this point and are still stuck in
mode and are abusing that to reverse the burden of proof like I already said.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
what do you mean by that? Like that experts dont normally carry a burden of proof or that only some parties should bear a burden of proof?
Also i didnt go to one source I went to several to show that your phobia of accupuncture is unfounded and basednin neocolonialist cisheteronormativity. I guess you know better than the large group of doctors that is the AMA(fair), butt why do you think you know more than Harvard or John Hopkins?(see thats two sources so not singular)
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context