I can't believe what I just listened to. The DNC Leader interrupted the party election to tell members that not enough non-binary candidates have been elected, so they MUST now vote for one.
— George (@BehizyTweets) February 1, 2025
"With the results of the previous four elections, our elected officers are currently two… pic.twitter.com/8CelMVzyE6
I genuinely feel bad for the Democrats that thought they would turn over a new leaf and drop the r-slurred woke shit
https://x.com/BehizyTweets/status/1885836927112552800
- 43
- 96
Now playing: DK Island Swing (DKC).mp3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not what xhe said though. "One person of any gender" does not mean non-binary. It's neurodivergentally r-slurred but not that r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They already have that, with that definition of any gender. 2 male + 2 female is balanced, you can assign the "any gender" position to anyone and it remains balanced.
They have some issue with that board makeup, so they must have a different definition of "any gender"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you're putting it in contrast to "male and female" and making a big deal out of "we currently have two men and two women elected so now we must elect a special person of any gender", that does sound very much like "not another man and not another woman".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context