I genuinely feel bad for the Democrats that thought they would turn over a new leaf and drop the r-slurred woke shit :marseyemojilaugh:

https://x.com/BehizyTweets/status/1885836927112552800
96
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's not what xhe said though. "One person of any gender" does not mean non-binary. It's neurodivergentally r-slurred but not that r-slurred.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They already have that, with that definition of any gender. 2 male + 2 female is balanced, you can assign the "any gender" position to anyone and it remains balanced.

They have some issue with that board makeup, so they must have a different definition of "any gender"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you're putting it in contrast to "male and female" and making a big deal out of "we currently have two men and two women elected so now we must elect a special person of any gender", that does sound very much like "not another man and not another woman".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: DK Island Swing (DKC).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.