It's mostly foids that seethe about passport bros, mainly because it violates their wishful thinking that "good things happen to good people".

Not all foids believe this, but the ones seething online about things like this are very much preoccupied with the idea of bad moids getting what they want (even consensually).

Incels mad someone else is getting a crumb and they're not

There was a tumblr post which was somethin akin to "if i could program i would make it so sexbots still reject incels" and that always stuck with me along with slat tweet about leftists always supporting the most harmful thing im any infight. Its about prolonging the suffering their political enemies cause, not ending it, in order to be able to complain about it for the longest possible duration

Whenever two shitlib pet issues clash with each other there is always this commentary like "oooh wonder which one will win" as though the shitlib will experience a cognitive dissonance and become confused about which to support first.

But they won’t. the methodology for… https://t.co/KKTQE2fvEh

— pagliacci the hated 🌝 (@Slatzism) July 2, 2024

@PeepeeButtKiss

its female intrasexual competition dressed up as concern for asians: access to international women decreases the bargaining power of western women

they know that women in developing countries have lower standards coupled with white worship that turns losers into winners.

its analogous to women being furious at men for dating 19 year olds: they'll dress it up as a social concern (creepy! what do you even talk about?) but really its insecurity about their own decreased value. whereas men may see such competition as a drive to do more (he's richer than me, i need to earn more*) women attack it with one of their most useful cowtools - social exclusion.

*male loser mentality goes on reddit to b-word about it but are rightly seen as losers.

Because men having this option reduces the value of western women.

Unironically I think they see it as some form of cheating the system to get around being a loser or something without putting in "dues" so to speak.

The problem with "passport bros" or just sexpats in general is that it's basically arranged marriage culture but with a fresh coat of paint where they pretend it's "trad" (which, I guess it is, just a lot further back than they're normally talking about)

It's just annoying, especially when it's the same types of dudes who complain about third world culture or whatever while they're actively giving out dowries to buy off some dude in the Philippines

Do you really think western women want to acknowledge that they're insufferable enough for people to leave the country just to date someone else?

You have never met a wmaf couple if you think that configuration results in a less racist man.

I used to do a little online dating mainly using Reddit. You can't fully judge the passport bros until you stumble upon one of the women looking for a passport bro. They are so desperate and bad at not transparently advertising how bad they want us citizenship. I mean, I feel bad for them and applaud their ingenuity but I'm not looking for an immigration lawyer anytime soon.

These passport bros really are bottom of the barrel. They are paying for these girls families to live and their families immigration on top of the girl he originally imported. It's some crazy financial cuckoldry they sign up for.

Passport bros aren't hated enough, imo.

>they not bothering you

Sorry sweaty please see Carp's cummy abortion post that debunks this

probably brokecels who dont have the money for s*x tourism or even just to hire a hooker

Western foids see it as competition. They oppose it as "exploitation" but they know that's bullshit.

Western moids go along with the shaming to try to show off to the western foids.