AnHeroedOatsme/mine
A Gertrude Trapped in a Stacylite Body
TR 9hr ago#7785959
spent 0 currency on pings
Hold my hat while I go for a second, but I think you're correct:
As I understand it, a catalyst works to increase or promote a reaction but said reaction would still eventually occur regardless of said catalyst's presence. With this in mind, to label "prevention" as an antonym would be a misnomer, as a catalyst is not what "allows" a reaction to occur.
Oscillations that have friction (or any non-conservative force) applied will lose energy until they eventually cease any motion are usually called damped oscillations, so tldr they should really have the lexical category next to the word for clarification purposes.
>As I understand it, a catalyst works to increase or promote a reaction but said reaction would still eventually occur regardless of said catalyst's presence.
To be more precise, a catalyst acts on the kinetics of a reaction, if a reaction isn't thermodynamically possible it won't happen with any amount of catalyst poured on it.
Catalysts speed up slow reactions and allows reactions that are thermodynamically possible but so slow they might as well never occur, to happen
If you aren't an autismo, a catalyst colloquially means something that causes something else to happen. Thus prevention would be the antonym. A catalyst enables a reaction to occur at a faster rate/lowers the energy needed to start one, so prevention still makes sense as an antonym anyway.
I genuinely thought it would be damp because a catalyst accelerates a reaction. So, by definition, if you want something to do the opposite, instead of preventing a reaction, you need a dampener for the reaction to slow down.
This online test is my personal 9/11 moment. !philosophers I have brought great shame upon this ping group.
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ESL chads rise up !macacos venham ensinar o carpa a falar inglΓͺs
Also what the frick is this question?
None of those are correct![:marseymalding: :marseymalding:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseymalding.webp)
If you really strecth the definitions I guess you could argue for damp
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eu chutei "current"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Os gringos falaram que é prevention, mas não bate nem com a definição cientifica nem com o jeito que vejo sendo usado coloquialmente.
Se eu precisasse chutar um antonimo de cabeça pra catalyst seria algo tipo r-slurant
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Antônimo de catalisador é prevenção? Wtf?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did they really pick the same words for different languages? Very scientific.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They changed "prevention" to de-stimulator. But yeah, all the questioned words were the same.
Current is a funny change.
In portuguese "correnteza" means water current only, while electric current is "corrente elΓ©trica", there's ambiguity in English but in Portuguese it has to be specific.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Faz o teste em portuguΓͺs kkk. Γ a mesma merda
lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
desistimulador Γ© um bom antonimo pra catalisador. Muito melhor que prevention.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Desestimular e prevenir nΓ£o estΓ£o nem prΓ³ximo de ser a mesma coisa
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Eu pensei em "electric current" quando li current. Mas em portuguΓͺs ele usa "correnteza", nΓ£o tem nem espaΓ§o pra ambiguidade no portuguΓͺs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Prevention
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It could also be damp if referring to the verb![:nerd: :nerd:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/nerd.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Stupid normies bastardizing scientific terms in common language reeeeeeeeeeee![:soyjaktantrum: :soyjaktantrum:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/soyjaktantrum.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Hold my hat while I go
for a second, but I think you're correct:
As I understand it, a catalyst works to increase or promote a reaction but said reaction would still eventually occur regardless of said catalyst's presence. With this in mind, to label "prevention" as an antonym would be a misnomer, as a catalyst is not what "allows" a reaction to occur.
Oscillations that have friction (or any non-conservative force) applied will lose energy until they eventually cease any motion are usually called damped oscillations, so tldr they should really have the lexical category next to the word for clarification purposes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You guys are r-slurred and should read more books. It's not that hard to understand abstractions of words.
Pretty good for somebody that doesn't even speak English as a first or second language ^^
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
To be more precise, a catalyst acts on the kinetics of a reaction, if a reaction isn't thermodynamically possible it won't happen with any amount of catalyst poured on it.
Catalysts speed up slow reactions and allows reactions that are thermodynamically possible but so slow they might as well never occur, to happen![:marseymoreyouknow: :marseymoreyouknow:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseymoreyouknow.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My man![:marseyyes: :marseyyes:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyyes.webp)
I love the chemistcels !ifrickinglovescience
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm with ya, except I'm not a chemist and all knowledge I have from the world come from video games
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If you aren't an autismo, a catalyst colloquially means something that causes something else to happen. Thus prevention would be the antonym. A catalyst enables a reaction to occur at a faster rate/lowers the energy needed to start one, so prevention still makes sense as an antonym anyway.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I genuinely thought it would be damp because a catalyst accelerates a reaction. So, by definition, if you want something to do the opposite, instead of preventing a reaction, you need a dampener for the reaction to slow down.
This online test is my personal 9/11 moment. !philosophers I have brought great shame upon this ping group.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Honestly, damper makes sense too. It's not like this was an expertly crafted test, anyway.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"Catalyst" is often used loosely to mean "cause."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
See this comment![:marseyunamused: :marseyunamused:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyunamused.webp)
https://rdrama.net/post/342080/take-this-esl-destroyer-test-immediately/7785619#context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The correct answer is prevention, because a catalyst would help something so prevention would prevent it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if he played poe he would know this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's what they do!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sorry for being a catalyst to your frustration![:marseytroll: :marseytroll:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseytroll.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If I wear a condom, I can't form a babby with my catalyst
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Catalyst is something that brings two things together
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
a catalyst speeds things up![:soyjaktantrumfast: :soyjaktantrumfast:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/soyjaktantrumfast.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It speeds up a reaction by binding critical elements neighbor
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context