Reported by:
  • Grue : Why was the "stonewall website" run by the feds??

:marseytrans2genocide:

https://skyview.social/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbsky.app%2Fprofile%2Faclu.org%2Fpost%2F3li3wsxz7x22y

Erasing our history won't erase us. Transgender people have always been here โ€” and we always will be.

ACLU (@aclu.org) 2025-02-14T00:24:16.388Z

https://skyview.social/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbsky.app%2Fprofile%2Fcinemacultist.bsky.social%2Fpost%2F3li47aqjcks2r

40
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • Grue : yeah what was it- I remember something about Marsha getting credit over one who was really present

lol because the whole shit about marsha p johnson starting the riot was a lie

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also he's wasn't even trans. He told every journ*list that he's a dude that likes to crossdress.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysurejan:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He was a run of the mill drag queen, and clearly not a very good one.

He would be first out on drag race, that's for sure :marseynails:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17396542673Jn612u7OJjpRA.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is that Michelle Obama or George Floyd?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm gonna do the chud thing of :chudsmug: imagine if the sides were reversed, but why is the movement all about the external not being your defining factor, identifying someone purely because of the way he chooses to present himself

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

CuckGPT

Marsha P. Johnson: Identity and Role in Stonewall

Marsha P. Johnson is widely celebrated as a pivotal figure in LGBTQ+ history, particularly for her involvement in the Stonewall Riots and advocacy for transgender rights. However, discussions about her identity and specific role in these events reveal a more nuanced picture.

Identity and Terminology

During her lifetime, the term "transgender" was not commonly used. Johnson referred to herself using various terms, including "gay," "transvestite," and "queen" (in the context of drag queen or "street queen"). She often used female pronouns but did not explicitly identify as transgender, as the term gained prominence after her death in 1992. Susan Stryker, a professor of gender and sexuality studies, noted that Johnson's gender expression could be described as gender non-conforming.

(Source: Wikipedia)

Role in the Stonewall Riots

While Johnson is a prominent figure associated with the Stonewall Riots, her exact involvement on the first night is subject to debate. Some accounts suggest she was present, while others indicate she arrived after the initial outbreak. Both Johnson and fellow activist Sylvia Rivera have, at times, denied being present at the start of the riots.

(Source: Wikipedia)

Conclusion

In summary, while Marsha P. Johnson is undeniably a significant figure in LGBTQ+ history, the specific labels regarding her identity and her precise actions during the Stonewall Riots are complex and have been interpreted in various ways over time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That was a mistake. You're about to find out the hard way why.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Deepseek

Based on the provided search results, here are the key sources and arguments that challenge the attribution of Marsha P. Johnson as a transgender woman and her role in initiating the Stonewall uprising:


1. Marsha P. Johnson's Self-Identification

  • Not Explicitly Identifying as Transgender: Johnson referred to herself as a "gay person," "transvestite," and "drag queen" during her lifetime. The term "transgender" was not widely used in her era, and she did not adopt it explicitly. She often used both male and female pronouns and rejected rigid gender labels, famously stating her middle initial "P" stood for "Pay It No Mind" when questioned about her gender .

  • Historical Context: In the 1960sโ€“70s, terms like "transvestite" and "drag queen" were distinct from modern "transgender" identities. Johnson's fluid expression complicates retroactive labeling .


2. Disputed Role in the Stonewall Uprising

  • Johnson's Own Account: In a 1987 interview, Johnson stated she arrived at the Stonewall Inn after the riots had begun (around 2 a.m.), contradicting claims that she "started" the uprising. She described the scene as already chaotic: "The place was already on fire... the riots had already started" .

  • Eyewitness Corroboration: Other accounts attribute the uprising's ignition to Stormรฉ DeLarverie, a butch lesbian who resisted arrest, or a collective response to police violence. Police reports and contemporaneous testimonies do not name Johnson as the instigator .

  • Myth vs. Reality: While Johnson participated actively in the riots (e.g., dropping objects on police cars), narratives crediting her with "throwing the first brick" or initiating the resistance are largely mythologized in later retellings .


3. Historical Revisionism and Activist Narratives

  • Modern Reinterpretation: Recent activism has emphasized Johnson as a "trans woman of color" to align with intersectional frameworks, despite historical ambiguity. Critics argue this revisionism prioritizes identity politics over factual accuracy .

  • Contradictions in Sources: Sylvia Rivera, Johnson's close collaborator, was also inconsistently described as present during the first night of Stonewall. Some accounts suggest Rivera was absent or unconscious in a park during the initial clash .


4. Institutional and Cultural Erasure Debates

  • National Park Service Revisions: In 2025, the Trump administration removed transgender references from the Stonewall National Monument website, sparking backlash. Critics argued this erasure mirrored historical exclusion of trans figures like Johnson, while others noted the complexity of retroactively applying modern labels .

  • Legacy vs. Accuracy: While Johnson's contributions to LGBTQ+ activism (e.g., co-founding STAR House) are undisputed, debates persist about framing her identity and Stonewall role through a contemporary lens .


Key Sources Challenging Common Attributions

1. Reason.com Article (2020): Questions Johnson's transgender identity and Stonewall leadership role, citing her own words and historical context .

2. NPS Profile (2020): Clarifies Johnson arrived at Stonewall after the riots began and emphasizes her activism beyond the uprising .

3. Penn State Blog Comments (2016): Includes primary source excerpts and debates over Johnson's and Rivera's presence at Stonewall .

4. NY Historical Society Profile: Notes Johnson's self-identification as a "transvestite" and "drag queen," not "transgender" .


Conclusion

The debate centers on historical accuracy versus modern identity frameworks. While Johnson's activism and legacy are celebrated, her self-identification and Stonewall role remain contested. Critics urge separating verifiable history from activist narratives to honor her contributions without mythologizing unverified claims . For further details, refer to the cited sources.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jesse what the frick are you talking about??

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Q+ predicted this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • Grue : What is there to learn here? That feds aren't friends?

Its kind of shit that they're removing them even from LGBT history, I would hope this would be a point of reflection for TRAs to maybe adjust their tactics so that most of the country aren't cheering it on but they will double down.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There would need to be more evidence that they were part of that history, not just drag queens and other crossdressers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • Grue : US Parks takes donations?

Another reason I stopped donating to them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When Trump Guantanamo Bays the entirety of the ACLU is when I know we live in a real fascist state.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gitmo will need a second McDonald's

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If he did that, he still wouldn't have come for anyone who would have stood up for me.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>we

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.