A Bunch of Human Biodiversity Nerds :marseychud: :sciencejak: Suddenly Have a Lot of :chudconcerned: :soyconcerned: Concerns About IQ When They Become the BIPOC :blacksoyjak: :blacksoyjak:

https://x.com/eyeslasho/status/1891284233970172386

Are those IQs inferred from standardized exams? Or from actual IQ exams? I wonder if robust measurements by academic levels and disciplines have ever been made.

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

Your IQ fluctuates throughout the day and from day to day. Also, familiarity with the test can affect subsequent scores. There's no truly reliable way to quantify intelligence.

(For irrelevance: my IQ tests at 168.)

I no longer believe in IQ now that it does not matter for me.

SAT's probably not a good indicator, it's a test taken before college, what's the spread after college. And you might be able to get something interesting taking the ingest SAT scores, then comparing with the graduating SAT scores. Got me wondering where they publish that data.

Uh. Naw, neighbor.

I trust your understanding of data. Yet every PhD program in Literature seem to be 20% literature and 80% Marx, Freud, Frankfurt, Foucault, Lacan, Derrida, Butler, A. Rich, Kristeva, and a gaggle of other post-structuralists and, Gott helfe uns, 'postmodern thinkers'.

Well, to be fricking fair, you need abstract thinking to understand postmodern thought which is why so many shitlibs fail hard at it.

Also helfe or hilf (the imperative form)?

That's got its own bias. Philosophy and Lit degree holders read a lot so naturally will score high on SAT and GRE (where the math portion is pretty basic, but reading comp questions could get tricky)

lol "not fair they read a bunch"

Are these creatures self aware?

Disguss

103
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The facst that modern "philosophers" seperate themselves from stemcels is why it's a useless major. Every great philosopher was a greek or roman scientist. Philosophy was created to attempt to explain how the world works and the advancement of science has made the feild obsolete.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Everytime I say STEMcels are r-slurs they post absolutely insanely r-slurred shit to prove me right !sophistry

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Name one great philosopher in the past 500 years that wasn't a scientist

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

RenΓ© Descartes

!sophistry

Also :#marseynietzscheretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>RenΓ© Descartes

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17398293084BHLW3e7_5cN4Q.webp

>Nietzsche

The virgin Nietzsche

Life is pointless and has no meaning :soycry:

Vs the chad Plato

The meaning of life is to do good :gigachad2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Life is pointless and has no meaning

nietzsche didn't say that

The meaning of life is to do good

plato didn't say that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nietzsche didn't say that

I know but I just think its funny to make fun of nihilism

plato didn't say that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_of_the_Good

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The form of the good isn't about doing good things like he's some dollar store papist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was simplifying it into the I have portrayed you as a soyjack and myself as the chad form

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Life is pointless and has no meaning

Ackshually Nietzche wasn't a nihilist

!sophistry defend :marseynietzsche:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe not an existential nihilist but Nietzsche was something of a moral nihilist.

But generally Nietzsche gets called a nihilist because people find his philosophy to be callous and antithetical to most other values, and they conflate a philosophy that stands against most value systems with one that's against the concept of having values, because they're r-slurred.

He also was a relativist more than a universalist, and so in a sense he was nihilistic about some people. Those who lean on slave morality, the weak, the infirm, etc. Basically what Plato and Aristotle would've called "natural slaves", what 1940's fascists would call untermensch and what modern Internet psuedointellectuals would call NPC's or degenerates.

Tldr: Nietzsche didn't believe life had no meaning, he believed your life had no meaning because you're gay and you suck.

!sophistry

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love that Descartes comic because it's so true.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Saul Kripke

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally who

Edit: He's a mathematician stemcel :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If logic counts as STEM I guess :marseyshrug:

Ok then Martha Nussbaum

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Martha is a woman's name dumbass

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Once again, literally who

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're rly telling on urself sweaty 😘

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

there are no great philosophers. philosophy is dead. stop spreading the harmful idea that there is great philosophy.

I'm not saying philosophy majors aren't smarter than stemcels, all philosophy majors are smarter than all stemcels. that doesn't mean philosophy is any more real than "computer science"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.