Most Based Comments
Basedness: ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐
It was r*pe. Not defined as such by New York law, but it was r*pe.I accept the ruling of the case, btw. Under New York law, it wasn't r*pe. But it was r*pe.Oh we only have a sexual assaulter as President. Wheew, i was worried there.Hey, genius There's a difference between the law and justice. And you can accept a court ruling and still think overpowering a woman in a department store and forcible digital penetration is r*pe.That is what you are defending. (38)
Basedness: ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐
That's not censorship. That's people agreeing or disagreeing with a comment. (40)
Basedness: ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐
People get banned for social views I'm aware of that, which i don't really agree with as long as they are not down right hatefulBut i see plenty of people discuss conservative economic policy (18)
Angriest Comments
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
That's because it's /r/conservative and not a general subreddit. The problem is every front page subreddit is basically /r/liberal. You get banned in /r/conservative for going against the grain, conservatives get banned in EVERY other subreddit for the same thing. (27)
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
Biggest Lolcow: /u/Ok-Description4359
Score: ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ(+1๐ฎ)
Number of comments: 18
Average angriness: ๐๐๐๐๐
Maximum angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐
Minimum angriness: ๐๐๐๐๐
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents.
Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They always trot out the one single remaining conservative sub as some trump card. Reddit couldn't be collectively censoring them as long as there's one tiny corner where they can have an opinion. And, as this person points out, the complaint about censorship doesn't mean that the self-titled "Liberal" sub requires liberal views or the self-titled "Conservative" sub requires conservative views. It's about the 40,000 other nominally unpolitical subs that insist you say "trans rights":
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, I understand why /r/conservative needs to have some censorship - if they didn't it would become co-opted by leftoids who want to discuss conservatism but who don't actually want to deal with conservatives, similar to what's happened to /r/neoliberal.
The problem is not that ideological safe spaces exist, it's that everything on Reddit is presumptively if not actually a leftoid safe space, even random hobby subs or red state subs or whatever else.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
they also never approach in good faith
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context