Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#dinoxd:

!chuds !neolibs laugh :marseyyourmom: at the huge potential frick up of commiefornia

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

California remains the 5th richest state by nominal GDP per capita in the US in 2024. If commiefornia is so successful then maybe it is time for the rest of America to become more "Commie" to succeed.

!nonchuds !redscarepod

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

California GDP is so significantly high is Silicon Valley

And they're starting the slow transition :marseypassftm: towards moving to Austin

They're seeing a mass exodus of people from the state :marseyusa: and cost of living :marseyjumpscare: is unbearable if you don't come from wealth

It's a U.S. state :marseycoonass: so it will always be a higher gdp than any (non tax haven) euro country :marseypalestineflag: but it's not exactly moving in a positive :marseyfingergoodjob: direction recently and seems to be moving into more aggressive actions ensuring lessened growth and loss of industry

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

California is still the richest state in the US. I will worry the day it reaches second place.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>things are going :marseysal2: in a negative :marseyzalgo: direction

>I won't even acknowledge the problem :marseycanofworms: until it's too late to fix

Smartest Indian :marseyivorytower:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rome has the largest economy in Europe. We should be more like Romulus Augustus

:@salvadore_ally_chudtalking:

!antibharatiya Is he simping for Cali because he thinks, just maybe, Newsom will see those posts and give him a green card? :marseyflirt:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Things are going in a negative direction so bad that California is getting richer every year and remains the richest economy in the world. How will Californians ever survive like this. :taylorlorenzcrying:

Smartest American. :marseyarabcelebration:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It'll survive and I stated as such. Frick even our worst state :marseygambler: gdp wise, Mississippi, has a higher gdp than almost all euro nations :marseypeacekeeper: besides Germany, but letting things get worse while sticking your head in the sand is r-slurred :marseyautism: when you could improve

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Things are getting worse when the economy keeps growing.

Really? How are things getting worse when everybody's life and wealth are improving? Which part of this is worse anon?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Life for the average Californian hasn't improved?

Hence the exodus they've been seeing

Again it's not end of the world :marseyww1german1: and the state :marseylouisiana: will go bankrupt

But it's definitely being trending :marseyetika: in a negative :marseyzalgo: way for years now and the post above is an example of a bad idea that will continue that trend :marseystocksupdown:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Didn't LA burn to the ground lmao


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17121718107069042.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Oh no, it's another 3rdy, lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The government is r-slurred, but California industry keeps chugging along despite this. The 'mass exodus' is talked about a lot as well but the numbers just don't back up the narrative. Every surrounding state feels like everyone in California is leaving, but that's just because there's so God darned many of them. An unnoticed blip in commie demographics is a deluge in Idaho. And it doesn't hurt that they're always so fricking obnoxious about being ex-Commiefornians

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>The 'mass exodus' is talked about a lot as well but the numbers just don't back up the narrative

CA lost a house seat for the first time in its history in 2020, and would have lost 2 if not for r-slurred/biased census takers.

The numbers do in fact back up the narrative.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neighbor in the past 4 years tech has only continued to concentrate in the Silicon Valley, which isn't even that big a portion of California's economy. Investments in places like Austin have stagnated while they only continue to soar in the Bay. Even places like Seattle outpace Austin. Said Bay only has a GDP of 700 Billion, still massive but less than 20% of California's GDP.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They have created a 250 billion dollar black hole vis a vis the fires

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Still the richest state in the US.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally entire state is in a deficit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Still the richest state in the US.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally not

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally is.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Which commie policies do you think led to this incredible growth?


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17121718107069042.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:

It doesn't matter, GDP growth is all the proof I need. Just because I am not smart enough to understand how it happened doesn't mean the output isn't real. I judge things by results not ideology.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're successful because they have beautiful weather and are a hub to Asia. Their policies didn't make Facebook and Apple the companies they became

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Okay and? California has the largest GDP among all US states. That is all that matters. Your ideological leanings are getting in the way of implementing policies that make a state rich.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gubmints start a new refinery with public funding because it creates jobs, boosts GDP, and heavy industries need a lot of capital commitments which you shouldn't leave to the whim of investors.

What in the LBO is California's plan? Let me read through FT and WSJ on this. Something doesn't feel right.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

California is known as a "gasoline island" lacking the kind of multistate logistics network through most of the continental U.S. that can help alleviate supply shocks. No pipelines exist to feed gasoline in from other states. Ocean shipments from the refinery-rich gulf states are restricted by an antiquated federal law known as the Jones Act. Gasoline imports add up to only 8% of California supply. The other 92% is nearly all produced at home.

I LoL'd as soon as I saw the Jones Act mentioned. It's one of the most brilliantly put together r-slurred legislation of all time

Last week as the US reported a record 2m barrels a day in crude oil exports, refineries located up the highway from Washington on the east coast imported about 900,000 b/d, mainly from Africa. A big reason is the Jones Act, a 97-year-old US law that requires all ships starting and ending their voyages on US coasts to be American-flagged, built and crewed.

But that doesn't mean Cuckfornia is any less r-slurred

California retail gasoline prices are consistently among the highest in the country and regularly exceed the U.S. average price by more than $1 per gallon. While multiple factors contribute to higher retail gasoline prices in California, including higher crude oil costs and higher refining costs on the West Coast, the region has also historically maintained lower inventory levels relative to the rest of the country.

How any of these issues (Jones Act, shift to renewables and price volatility from low inventory because of reservoir capacity) could be overcome by the state taking over is beyond me. @C333 coukd you ping neolibs again

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Add another dollar tax to gas in California it is.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TL;DR: SerGay's rant about California's "gasoline island" problems sounds like a sad, entitled whine from a rich person who can't even be bothered to look up the Jones Act. Newsflash: it's 97 years old and still relevant because you're too lazy to do your own research, loser.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseywheeze: @J is this the real output?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you like it? Its not mine btw

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

kinda yeah

it's a little sassier than I expected tho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Were you expecting a useful tool lol no ones gonna read the original thing anyway

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

@SerGay did u see this bb lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyxdorbit:

What the frick

Is this bussyboy: deepseek version?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No pipelines exist to feed gasoline in from other state

JUST BUILD A PIPELINE HOLY SHIT CALIFORNIANS WOULD RATHER GO FULL MARXIST SEIZE THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION THEN JUST MAKE A PIPELINE LIKE EVERY OTHER STATE

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Some of the neolib and rationalist bloggers have the Jones act as their pet cause. It's insane how utterly r-slurred of a law it is and how it achieved the exact opposite of it's goal and dismantled American ship building.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

actually it's all trumps fault. california did nothing wrong. :hmph:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This but unironically. Tariffs on imported oil will make US refining products less competitive.

Its like the r-slurred drill baby drill shit, no one is going to invest extra capital in US production or transport when the next POTUS will reverse course on it. Tariffs will delay capital expenditures on oil production as they reduce returns.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Other than Canada who are we tariffing that imports crude to the U.S.?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.