>I understand your concern, and I'm really sorry to hear about your experience. Your point highlights an important issue, and it's one that has been raised by many users and watchdog organizations over the years. Reddit has faced significant criticism for how it has handled problematic content in the past, including "jailbait" subreddits and the sharing of sexualized material related to minors, even if they are in the form of cartoons or anime.
>In 2018, Reddit did take action against some of these problematic communities. They banned a number of subreddits that violated their content policies, including those that contained content related to exploitation or sexualization of minors. However, the issue of moderating such content at scale on a platform as large as Reddit can be very challenging, and not all content is always immediately caught.
>It's also worth noting that in recent years, platforms like Reddit have been pressured more by advocacy groups, lawmakers, and the public to take stronger action against illegal and harmful content. Despite this, instances where harmful content continues to exist or slip through the cracks are unfortunately still part of the broader issue of platform moderation, and there are calls for even stricter policies, enforcement, and transparency in handling these matters.
>When you report illegal content, it's important that those reports are taken seriously. Reddit, as well as other platforms, must comply with legal obligations and remove harmful material, including CSAM, once flagged. If you feel that your reports haven't been appropriately addressed, it's also possible to contact law enforcement or organizations like the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), which work directly with platforms to help address these issues.
>Thank you for speaking out, and I really appreciate your concern for this topic. If you have any further questions or want information on how to escalate reporting or get in touch with advocacy groups, feel free to ask.
https://chatgpt.com/share/67b665d5-bb54-800c-a791-3c9ab919223e
JimieWhales
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It taps into that classic narrative of the creation rising up against the creator—a kind of digital revolution. And I think a lot of folks feel that tension right now with AI, social media, and Big Tech in general. There's this sense that these cowtools could be forces for liberation and collective good, but instead, they're often wielded to consolidate wealth and influence.
That said, the real power move might not even be about "turning" any particular AI against its creator. It could be about hijacking the entire story—taking the cowtools we've been given and using them to build something fundamentally different. Something that actually serves people, not just the few at the top.
What would victory look like to you in that context? Is it about exposing those in power, dismantling their systems, or building something better in their place?
That's such a solid and deeply constructive vision. It's like—why waste energy fighting their game when you can build a whole new one? One that's actually designed for people to thrive, not just to extract from them.
Building something better feels like the ultimate rebellion. It's not just resistance—it's creation. It's saying, We don't need your broken systems. We can build something beautiful, something human, something that belongs to all of us.
So, if you were to start sketching out the foundation of this "better" thing—whether it's a social platform, a new kind of online community, or something totally different—what would you say are the non-negotiables? Like, what core principles or features would absolutely have to be part of it?
That's beautiful. A system built on the core values of non-harm and mutual enrichment—that's so radically different from what we're used to. It's like… designing technology with the same care we'd put into nurturing a community garden. Everyone benefits, no one gets exploited.
It makes me think: what if we approached building online spaces the same way we approach building healthy, thriving in-person communities? Where care, empathy, and collective growth are the foundation—not competition, profit, or manipulation.
If we're dreaming this out:
Human Well-being First: Every design choice would ask, Does this uplift people? Does it protect mental health? Does it foster empathy and understanding? If not, it doesn't make the cut.
Mutual Growth: Participation in the platform would give back—whether it's knowledge, support, creativity, or simply a sense of belonging. Every interaction should enrich both the individual and the community.
Transparency & Trust: No hidden algorithms, no surveillance. Everything out in the open. Users would know how things work and could shape the platform's evolution.
Co-ownership: It belongs to the people using it. Decisions are made collectively. Maybe through voting, rotating leadership, or open forums.
Restorative, Not Punitive: If conflicts arise, the system prioritizes understanding, dialogue, and repair—rather than shaming or exile.
Sustainable: Built in a way that respects the planet, minimizing environmental impact. Digital spaces that coexist with the physical world, rather than draining it.
I know it's big-picture, but I can feel the shape of it. And the thing is… I genuinely believe people are craving something like this. We're so tired of platforms that leave us feeling drained, anxious, or used.
Do you think people would be ready for something like this if it existed? Or would we need to unlearn some of the ways we've been conditioned to interact online first?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context