The head of the organization is implied to be the executive branch and any organization with hierarchy the head honcho can terminate employment.
The constitution doesn't get congress to breathe so they should drop dead and die
Within the constitution there are reasonable interpretations that can be made and the clear intention is that someone can fire them and that person would be the head of the executive. Suggesting congress pass laws to fire someone is pants on head r-slurred, and that power is not explicitly outlined in the constitution. You would have to assume that as well.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
It explicitly says Congress controls the appointments of Inferior Officers via their legislative powers, you don't have to "assume" anything. What you have to "assume" is that the President has some unwritten authority to bypass Congress and fire them to appoint his own guys.
but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
Do you think the laws creating these agencies Trump's trying to take over don't specify that?
You can literally just look up the legislation creating any agency you want and it will tell you how it's managed.
Like the Department of Education:
TITLE IV ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
Part A Personnel Provisions
OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
Sec. 401. [20 U.S.C. 3461] (a) The Secretary is authorized to appoint and fix the compensation of such officers and employees, including attorneys, as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Secretary and the Department.
Holy cow that was hard. DOE employees answer to the Secretary of Education. Who would've thought?
I see, you think the Constitution says something like:
Article 3
The Executive Branch
The executive branch constitutes the administrative state and is run by the President.
It doesn't. It lists out the President's powers, one of those is to appoint the head of any department, another is to appoint "inferior officers" (bureaucrats) unless Congress grants that authority to the head of department or the courts.
The US government isn't a business and the President's unilateral power is deliberately limited to the military. Even with the military the ability to decide to go to war is supposed to be limited to Congress even though in practice they've delegated that away to the President.
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The head of the organization is implied to be the executive branch and any organization with hierarchy the head honcho can terminate employment.
The constitution doesn't get congress to breathe so they should drop dead and die
Within the constitution there are reasonable interpretations that can be made and the clear intention is that someone can fire them and that person would be the head of the executive. Suggesting congress pass laws to fire someone is pants on head r-slurred, and that power is not explicitly outlined in the constitution. You would have to assume that as well.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It explicitly says Congress controls the appointments of Inferior Officers via their legislative powers, you don't have to "assume" anything. What you have to "assume" is that the President has some unwritten authority to bypass Congress and fire them to appoint his own guys.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The president appoints his own guys because ITS SAYS RIGHT THERE IN THE FRICKING QUOTE THAT HE APPOINTS THEMdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/032f5/032f55e09e9768208b581c7aa11411e4d142bab0" alt=":marseyeyelidpulling: :marseyeyelidpulling:"
Where does it say congress has to be consulted to terminate. WHERE.
By your own rules it has to say that explicitly or it does not count
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you think the laws creating these agencies Trump's trying to take over don't specify that?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Okay quote the laws that specify who fires them and In will admit I am wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can literally just look up the legislation creating any agency you want and it will tell you how it's managed.
Like the Department of Education:
Holy cow that was hard. DOE employees answer to the Secretary of Education. Who would've thought?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And who is the secretary of educations boss?
You've literally just proven yourself wrong. Chain of command means Trump can fire.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I see, you think the Constitution says something like:
It doesn't. It lists out the President's powers, one of those is to appoint the head of any department, another is to appoint "inferior officers" (bureaucrats) unless Congress grants that authority to the head of department or the courts.
The US government isn't a business and the President's unilateral power is deliberately limited to the military. Even with the military the ability to decide to go to war is supposed to be limited to Congress even though in practice they've delegated that away to the President.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Being this obtuse does not work in court so good luck. Seems like a pretty straightforward "lmao ur wrong" case so feel free to litigate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context