Wonder why Hooters is going bankrupt :marseyhmm:

https://x.com/wildfirewhisper/status/1893155778539724830

!transphobes !nooticers

54
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Chuds being outraged about a random unsourced photo, where the uniforms don't even match, what else is new? :yawn:

Nah, it can't be manufactured outrage, it's definitely their lived experience, all Hooters are full of non-passing trans cuties and they certainly weren't sued for refusing to hire them :marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Motherlover let them be a janitor or something if you can't refuse to hire them.

Also, from your article:

Hooters, however, painted a vastly different picture — alleging that Livingston was asked to not return to the restaurant for alarming behavior starting before she transitioned.

The wannabe worker made multiple servers uncomfortable by proposing marriage and discussing masturbation — and even threatened to go to a gun range to practice for the next time she visited, Hooters told the outlet via lawyers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Chuds being outraged about a random unsourced photo, where the uniforms don't even match, what else is new?

I don't get it. You think this picture is fake somehow? There's clearly just different levels of skin exposure they let you pick from. There's a full shirt that the :marseytrain2:s are wearing, a belly shirt that two of the girl have, and then the skimpiest option of the tank top that the girl on the left has. You'll also notice some of them are opting for skin colored tights and others aren't.

Edit: Also, high rise vs low rise shorts.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.