Top Poster of the Day:
J
Current Registered Users: 31,123
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Top Poster of the Day:
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sorry only Bethesda
games go on the list
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
FO4 is the best Bethesda game ever
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
avowed more like avoid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
copying slop creates more slop who'd have thunk
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm trying Avowed because it's on gamepass, but I just don't care that much. It doesn't have me seething as much as most online rightoids, but the dialogue does have a lot of that quippy, quirky marvelization BS.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They made Garrus a gay fish
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Isn't two worlds the one with pretty cool magic atleast?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Two worlds 2 does
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Two worlds is so bad but I love it
The goofy dialogue and weird systems make it entertaining. I remember my friends thought the intro cutscene was an elaborate joke when I showed it to them.
I DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT TIME
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This but unironically
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
3 > NV
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context