Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the ultimate leftoid cope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not only should he have been convicted of some sort of felony so that he wouldn't be allowed to have a firearm again, but also so that he would be on supervised probation, and REQUIRED to hold down gainful employment.

The prosecutors fricked up royally.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not only should he have been convicted of some sort of felony

Really any felony would do, no particular preference for anything specific :fatbrain: :marseybigbrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Really any felony would do

Actually yes, A good prosecutor should know

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Agreed, a good prosecutor could have easily pinned him down for "the felony".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The prosecutor clearly didn't have a case and knew it

:marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol good bait

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.