Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the ultimate leftoid cope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not only should he have been convicted of some sort of felony so that he wouldn't be allowed to have a firearm again, but also so that he would be on supervised probation, and REQUIRED to hold down gainful employment.

The prosecutors fricked up royally.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The prosecutor clearly didn't have a case and knew it

:marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol good bait

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not only should he have been convicted of some sort of felony

Really any felony would do, no particular preference for anything specific :fatbrain: :marseybigbrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Really any felony would do

Actually yes, A good prosecutor should know

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Agreed, a good prosecutor could have easily pinned him down for "the felony".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I still can't believe how they didn't get him on the crossing state lines charge :marseyraging:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm really disappointed that they didn't go after him for the straw purchase shit which was a conspiracy felony he actually committed, because the new face of gun politics not being legally able to own a gun would lead to hilarious drama

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That would have been the one thing they could have and should have won. Instead of going to "murder"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The sneed is bountiful

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OP :marseykyle:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Frog poster == opinion discarded. Be better, chud.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Take it up with the fish.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tbh it would have been pretty based of them to give it back

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wanna know what average Redditors think about him wanting to destroy the rifle. Did hitler destroy his rifle?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He deserves a medal for killing a couple of degenerates.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wow, that place is awful! Found them quoting and tagging you there. Also, looks like you responded but they deleted your comments? Seriously, ignore that place. It looks like they just enjoy dumping on things that people enjoy, which is all manner of sad...

Honestly I had no idea that sub existed, apparently neither did she. Then they tagged her over there and... lolcow? Is a thing. It's a person they "milk for lols"; don't ask...

It is way, way, way more toxic than her edit. I think she just edited her post to address her own confusion as to why a group of emotionally stunted folks would do that... but, hey, it's the internet. Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.