https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-save-our-family-after-a-horrific-incident
- 65
- 87
Top Poster of the Day:
YouTubeTargetedAd
Current Registered Users: 26,299
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 4dd90e8
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I always enjoy when people who can't write feel the need to try and be formal and instead just spew nonsense.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Frick me that gave me a good belly laugh take my updoot fine internet friend.
Real talk though I did fricking have a good laugh.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Idiots think using ultra-formal language makes them more
credulouscredible because they're idiots and they assume everyone else is just as confused by fancy language as they are.Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
credible
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's a perfectly cromulent word.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
whom even writes/talks like that?! this ain't ye olde english!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Whom is just what you use for direct or indirect objects. Who for he/she/they, whom for him/her/them. The irony is that not only is the "he" unnecessary in her sentence, but she should be using "who", not "whom".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah but whoms't even knows that kind of stuff
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Is "who" correct because the clause after the comma is independent? It sounds weird but isn't "I" the subject?
"he" is throughly r-slurred, though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The clause is describing the older brother. If the clause were a sentence on its own, then "he" would be used instead of "who". I don't know the explicit syntax rules behind this but that's my reasoning for why "who" is used.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I guess it comes down to subject of the clause as opposed to subject of the sentence. The bona fide subject of the whole sentence is OP making the post online.
Frick this. We should just retire the word "whom". Give me Spanish as a lingua franca instead. That would eradicate so many problems and we'd all be having so much more s*x and stuff.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Asian family
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context