Not really much drama, but thereβs some good snappy material in there.
Peepee size should be a volumetric measurement.
Let me explain, Western culture has popularized the outdated unit of inches as the common benchmark for comparing peepee size. However, itβs 2022 now, we are advancing towards being a multi planetary species; a single axis measurement for a 3D object all of us possess is medieval, and simply not fit for current use.
I suggest a new unit; millimeters - however if this becomes commonly adopted I wish to be credited, please state the unit of peepee size as Venus peepee points as I am certain I am the first individual to suggest this. The new methodology of measuring peepee should be as followed;
The peepee is inserted into a measuring cup until it cannot be inserted further.
The volume of liquid displaced should equal peepee volume.
Complete the conversion; 1ml of displaced peepee water = 1 Venus peepee point.
Please, help me abolish this out dated system - it wrongly paints a world of peepee size based on length; perhaps residents of higher than average African nations have gained an unfair advantage over our Asian brothers; we are using a RACIST system based on length not volume to discriminate peepeees worldwide.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is this fellow r-slurred? This measurement depends on the exact measuring cup you use, specifically the cross sectional area of it at the point where its filled to. The more obvious unit is milliliters, which could be determined by reading off of the side of the measuring cup. But really, we need two measurements, not just one, much like with pants. Length and circumference, both in inches, ought to do fine. We would write it LxC, eg a 6 inch peepee measuring 5 inches around would be described as 6"x5". We can compute the volume in milliliters easier as L x C^2 x 1.3. So our previous example of 6"x5" would have a volume of 195 ml.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context