Unable to load image

[๐Ÿค“๐Ÿค“๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜] Sexual Harassment and Retaliation

https://old.reddit.com/r/ChicksInTheOffice/comments/unk5lr/sexual_harassment_and_retaliation

Most Based Comments

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

You are applying normal workplace standards to a place that isnโ€™t normal in any circumstance. Congrats on thinking this has any weight (1)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Again this is all retaliation, not dismissal. Retaliation. (3)

i swear the Hank supporters in this page lack reading comprehension skills (0)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Never thought Iโ€™d see myself comment in the CITO sub, but Iโ€™d like to jump in with the others and say thereโ€™s no fricking chance in heck Marty Mush sues, and if he did thereโ€™s no chance in heck he wins. This is absolutely delusional thinking and would be embarrassing if anybody you worked with knew you typed this out. Theyโ€™d just assume youโ€™re a moron. (-3)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Youโ€™re skipping over part of it. Because of this situation Dan and Dave donโ€™t want to work with Marty, which is their right. Martyโ€™s only productive work has been with Dave and Dan. If he doesnโ€™t find something else productive to do he wonโ€™t be renewed. Not renewing an employee thatโ€™s not productive is their right and theyโ€™d have proof if it ever did go to a lawsuit. It was spelled out so a first grader could understand it. (1)

Yes, but it's retaliatory behavior tied into sexual harassment. Grilling an employee over when he started "boning" her and then outlining your plan to not renew them because you're not comfortable working with them anymore is crazy. Dave is literally his boss and had a demonstrable track record of working a shit ton with him and now will completely abandon him. To what you're saying --- if Dave never said any of this, never had him on the show, used all that vulgar language, etc... and just slowly stopped working with him and faded him due to performance without a mention of the Hank/Ria angle nobody would have ever been the wiser. But he is publicly making it about a personal relationship, albeit office-related, but still over the top.The rest of the staff (both men and women) don't really seem to have a problem with it. (1)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Never thought Iโ€™d see myself comment in the CITO sub, but Iโ€™d like to jump in with the others and say thereโ€™s no fricking chance in heck Marty Mush sues, and if he did thereโ€™s no chance in heck he wins. This is absolutely delusional thinking and would be embarrassing if anybody you worked with knew you typed this out. Theyโ€™d just assume youโ€™re a moron. (-3)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”˜

If you think that Dave didnโ€™t have lawyers listen to a pre recorded podcast or been discussing the vernacular they could use when talking about Marty you are crazy.They never said they were firing Marty for the relationship, Dave said he doesnโ€™t see Marty creating sustainably profitable content without him or Dan leading to no reason to renew his contract. (10)

I doubt he has lawyers review his youtube show. Just because someone does something illegal doesn't mean you can say "do you think he'd say that if he knew it was illegal?" That's not how life works. People frick up all the time. Do you know how many lawyers are out there? Why do you think that is? (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/benpatman314

Score: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Number of comments: 4

Average angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Maximum angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Minimum angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Does anyone know what this is about lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Long time OG stool employee dated a chick who also works there for 4 years. I think they may have even been engaged at some point, but not positive.

They break up. He's really sad. 1-5 months (this is being heavily disputed) later she and another coworker started hooking up. Said dude coworker isn't an OG, and doesn't bring a lot of money into the company. He is on shows that involve other big personalities

The owner and one of the other OG employees said it was a scumbag move and won't work with him. Owner said if he doesn't find a way to bring in money, he's gone when his contract ends.

Considering many of the people in the office now won't work with him, it's very unlikely he gets a show up off the ground that people will watch, so he's pretty much donezo.

The barstool fans are arguing over whether it's right to fire an employee for breaking bro code. others are arguing if the woman deserves more or less hate for being involved.

That's the general gist of it. Also worth noting the sub this post is linking to is for a podcast that the chick is on. Barstool also owned "Call Me Daddy" for a short time and there's a good amount of mix between the audience. The Call Me Daddy drama was pretty amazing, you should look into it if you ever get a chance

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that's hilarious. its a business of frat boys

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!blackjack100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!black100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseykween:

!blackjack100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!blackjack100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseypharaoh:

Snapshots:

/u/benpatman314:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.