https://old.reddit.com/r/ChicksInTheOffice/comments/unk5lr/sexual_harassment_and_retaliation

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

You are applying normal workplace standards to a place that isn’t normal in any circumstance. Congrats on thinking this has any weight (1)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

Again this is all retaliation, not dismissal. Retaliation. (3)

i swear the Hank supporters in this page lack reading comprehension skills (0)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

Never thought I’d see myself comment in the CITO sub, but I’d like to jump in with the others and say there’s no fricking chance in heck Marty Mush sues, and if he did there’s no chance in heck he wins. This is absolutely delusional thinking and would be embarrassing if anybody you worked with knew you typed this out. They’d just assume you’re a moron. (-3)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

You’re skipping over part of it. Because of this situation Dan and Dave don’t want to work with Marty, which is their right. Marty’s only productive work has been with Dave and Dan. If he doesn’t find something else productive to do he won’t be renewed. Not renewing an employee that’s not productive is their right and they’d have proof if it ever did go to a lawsuit. It was spelled out so a first grader could understand it. (1)

Yes, but it's retaliatory behavior tied into sexual harassment. Grilling an employee over when he started "boning" her and then outlining your plan to not renew them because you're not comfortable working with them anymore is crazy. Dave is literally his boss and had a demonstrable track record of working a shit ton with him and now will completely abandon him. To what you're saying --- if Dave never said any of this, never had him on the show, used all that vulgar language, etc... and just slowly stopped working with him and faded him due to performance without a mention of the Hank/Ria angle nobody would have ever been the wiser. But he is publicly making it about a personal relationship, albeit office-related, but still over the top.The rest of the staff (both men and women) don't really seem to have a problem with it. (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Never thought I’d see myself comment in the CITO sub, but I’d like to jump in with the others and say there’s no fricking chance in heck Marty Mush sues, and if he did there’s no chance in heck he wins. This is absolutely delusional thinking and would be embarrassing if anybody you worked with knew you typed this out. They’d just assume you’re a moron. (-3)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

If you think that Dave didn’t have lawyers listen to a pre recorded podcast or been discussing the vernacular they could use when talking about Marty you are crazy.They never said they were firing Marty for the relationship, Dave said he doesn’t see Marty creating sustainably profitable content without him or Dan leading to no reason to renew his contract. (10)

I doubt he has lawyers review his youtube show. Just because someone does something illegal doesn't mean you can say "do you think he'd say that if he knew it was illegal?" That's not how life works. People frick up all the time. Do you know how many lawyers are out there? Why do you think that is? (1)