You may have noticed that most social media users that are obsessed with politics are zoomers. It's important that we as draumanaughts do everything we can to upset them. The key is to remind them that because of their age, their opinion is worthless. This works even if you are a zoomer too, because they're convinced anyone against them is an evil boomer and revealing your age to them leads to some delicious cognitive dissonance.
For maximum seethe, try responding to zoomer agendaposts with some of these:
- Let me guess, you're still in high school?
- It's okay, I believed things just to spite my parents when I was your age too!
- I'm sorry your father isn't around.
- Child detected, opinion discarded.
- Omg my parents told me I should say the same thing!
- Why would I listen to someone with no real world experience?
- Wow that's crazy, I thought this too before I became an adult!
- Don't worry, you'll grow out of this opinion!
The last one in particular is VERY effectively at causing seethe/spergouts. No, I don't have a link, I have to go back to the lab soon and this post has already taken too much effort. I recommend following any of these with condescending emojis like ๐ค, and ๐ฅฐ. Go try this on Reddit or something and post your results here. This concludes my low-effort post.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
To handle the rare edge case where the person is actually an adult, its more effective to play a mind game where YOU larp as a child.
For example:
Le redditeur:
You:
Highly innocuous and unbannable, it invalidates their opinion entirely to themselves and others but leaves little room for counterattack. If they lack self awareness and respond agreeably you can continue the charade, but act less and less mature with each comment.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Rdditors who think you're a child will try to have s*x with you. Reddit is a groomers playground.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Let him believe heโs grooming you and then cancel him for maximum seethe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's the issue. In my bait I always leave a glaring, obviously exploitable weakness or fallacy, so the redditor can bite down hard and continue the "conversation"
Use the sunk cost fallacy to your advantage by leading them in with an actual argument, only to then open up seethe inducing tactics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I love the book of sneed weโre building here for faithful dramanauts
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Art Of Sneed
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm gonna have to make an effortpost about this, aren't I?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Encyclopedia DRAMAtica?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Brilliant
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The Chad Dramautist reading the Art of War to better prepare himself for dramatic internet confrontations.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Holy shit I didn't even see the parallels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I used to only throw out as clever a bait as I could muster, but I find itโs more fun to throw patently ridiculous bait instead.
You catch fewer plebbitors, but the oneโs you do catch are usually grade-A, pizza-esque, spergs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I really like this one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thanks, I learned it in the IDF.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We respect our brave troops o7
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
the kids are alright :)
nah b-word, the kids are altright
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context