Unable to load image

Just created a sub for male lesbians. Come and show support kings.

https://old.reddit.com/r/truemalelesbians

Inspired by this post and this wiki entry. Come and post memes and shit. If we get enough people we can start some real seethe.

76
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

look up false dilemma before continuing on to beat that absurdist straw horse way past a death it never deserved ...

also, feudal systems are still rich people living off of poor people, and would invariably trash the world with fossil fuel power idiocracy, just like capitalism did.

so, obviously not.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Could you define "false dilemma" and "straw horse" for me please?

What economic system would you posit?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no.

one that bans property rights, public, private, and personal, but still maintains a legal system as a preventative measure against violence.

i believe i might call this economic anarchy. but still with a democratic (perhaps representative, maybe liquid) government to deal with violent individuals.

eventually it'd be nice to reach full anarchy, but that'll take some generations of cultural evolution before we can truly forgo enforcement all together.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yo that sounds pretty R slurred to me, if you want to get rid of property rights you are a literal mong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i missed out on learning to be a psychopath, yes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neighbor your that dude who wants to frick dogs, and your out here talking about not being a psychopath lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lying is a typical sign of being a psychopath.

i dunno why you bother trying to delude yourself otherwise, you quite clearly have absolutely zero intention to engaging in an honest manner.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You frick dogs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i understand you're weak and need to lie to yourself for your own sake. but that doesn't make you right

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Lol r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Please. I haven't heard those terms before.

So stop the poor from fricking by making everyone poor? Democratic sentencing of violent individuals? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what makes poverty possible is the fact the rich can hoard wealth using violence. stop that, and poverty fundamentally stops being a possibility.

once people aren't generally stressed out by their mere existence, they will (a) not breed as much, and (b) be more conscientious of their environment.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Still not sure what those terms you were using are.

Do you feel generally stressed out by your mere existence? Does this feeling also make you horny?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

like words, what do they even mean?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry, just trying to understand why you think having no property will make people less stressed, and therefore less horny, and care about the environment more than they do now. Seems that people with no property do most the breeding, and middle/upper class only hold off so they can maintain their wealth.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

banning property rights does not mean no property, it means you can't use violence to defend property. you can still use things, just not enforce exclusivity. if society actually produces enough for everyone, then you can pragmatically have your own things, because it's simply easier to use "your" things and those of others. this will incentivize production processes that produce wealth for all, instead of wealth for a few, and just enough for the rest to keep them in line with the violence that underwrites societal functioning.

will some people just leech? probably, but it would very likely be a negligible percentage, and come with social costs that make it ultimately not worth it. with modern technology we can create a very detailed record of who made/did what, and who used/consumed what, and with that, alongside social reinforcement, create strong incentives to keep societal functional.

and probably a lot more functional than capitalism, because allowing complete vertical integration of all our production processes will produce an efficiency the likes of which has never been seen.

Seems that people with no property do most the breeding, and middle/upper class only hold off so they can maintain their wealth.

people who spend more time self-actualizing, because they have the resources to do so, tend not to over breed.

they also have more time to care about their environment.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

So there are infinite resources and all people would be rich if the rich didn't hoard these infinite resources?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

but muh scarcity.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.