Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

got deleted

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1722451974004905.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Actually pretty funny :marseylaughwith:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>I dug this hole

You didn't dig that hole! A Caterpillar 336 did! You exerted no effort. A real hole takes time. Now look at Rodney's hole: he used a shovel. Rodney's hole took effort.

>While digging the hole took no time, I still had to rent the Caterpillar, and determine the size of my hole, and where to dig.

Sure, but Rodney's passionate about holes. Your hole has no soul. It's nothing like the holes of yore: holes we dug with trowels, knives, spoons; holes we dug with our hands. Dirty-fingernail holes. Holes you think back on, and think: god, digging that hole was difficult. Why did I dig that hole? Why am I always digging holes? Because I must.

>My hole is to regulation: I can dig a thousand of these holes now, and I never have to get dirty.

But getting dirty is the point of digging holes! If you're not dripping sweat, covered in dirt and three feet below the earth, can you really call it a hole?

>It's just a hole like any other hole. I just didn't have to work at it.

I liked this hole before I found out it's an unnatural hole; now I wouldn't even shit in that hole. You should be ashamed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know what you said, because I've seen another human naked.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He was ranting about holes again, lpb. Common theme among the braincels on this site.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When you think about it, the average zoomer who doesn't even own a sharpened knife is actually a great chef because they can make high quality food in a fraction of the time with no mess by writing prompts in uber eats.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not saying you're an artist if you're generating slop; but if someone's analyzing pixels, and still has to kinda guess if something is AI or not, then you're certainly generating some shit that LOOKS like an artist may have made it.

And then if you ARE an artist generating slop, and then editing it to be indistinguishable from real from-sketch art, then are you just another prompter, or are you simply saving time?

I guess to use your example: is a pie worse simply because your mom didn't make it herself, and lied that she did? What about if she made the whole pie, but bought the pie crust? If she made the whole thing, but didn't grow the strawberries herself, is she sorta lying about having made it from scratch? If she used the sun to grow the berries, and not the light of her smile, then isn't she just a lying-c*nt whore pieforger still?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It looks kinda real to me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Only the distant background dinos are really off. Clean those up and you've got a

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah i see that and the t-rex has horns

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah, ceratosaur. Some of them were like that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.