If there's one consolation, their narrative of India's once greatness being ruined by invaders directly fuels the attitude that leads electing rightoid parties. The rightoids only build upon this victimization narrative the only difference being that according them our decline started with arrival Mohammed not Clive like lefty authors like to pretend. Electoral results show which approach is more effective. They deserve their political irrelevance.
Their arguments have gotten stupider since drain of wealth. Like this author claims agri commercialization in 19th century happened to meet anglo tax demands not out of capitalist profit seeking. Like what bipoc tax demands(aside from being extremely low) were on % of produce not some absolute value how the frick does that make sense even in his midwit marxoid mind?
I have another course on medieval economic history and the difference qualitatively between the two is massive. With much less data to go on that one manages to be much more logical. I hate these 'people' so much.
I was literally thinking it must be some Bengali. Even Roy is the way he is because he started questioning the Marxist hyperbole being shoved down everyone's throats in WB. Unfortunately, Bengal was one of the first states to fall for this ideology. Sed what they did to the state.
IVIayaelTheAnimaI/We
I’m 100% certain that at least half the mods do not have Faith or the Holy Spirit.
1yr ago#3436874
Edited 1yr ago
spent 0 currency on pings
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If there's one consolation, their narrative of India's once greatness being ruined by invaders directly fuels the attitude that leads electing rightoid parties. The rightoids only build upon this victimization narrative the only difference being that according them our decline started with arrival Mohammed not Clive like lefty authors like to pretend. Electoral results show which approach is more effective. They deserve their political irrelevance.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Their arguments have gotten stupider since drain of wealth. Like this author claims agri commercialization in 19th century happened to meet anglo tax demands not out of capitalist profit seeking. Like what bipoc tax demands(aside from being extremely low) were on % of produce not some absolute value how the frick does that make sense even in his midwit marxoid mind?
I have another course on medieval economic history and the difference qualitatively between the two is massive. With much less data to go on that one manages to be much more logical. I hate these 'people' so much.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who is this leftoid author?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Aditya Mukherjee
At least Tirthankar Roy is a Bengali too I hate it when my people turn out strags like this one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I was literally thinking it must be some Bengali. Even Roy is the way he is because he started questioning the Marxist hyperbole being shoved down everyone's throats in WB. Unfortunately, Bengal was one of the first states to fall for this ideology. Sed what they did to the state.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Where is this from? Does it defend the Licence Raj?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah he praises economic 'progress' post independence.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Life advice when dealing with marxists:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context