"Who on average contributes more to the genocide of ethnic Brit's, a white American taxpayer with British ancestry or an Indian living in Britain?" Users on r/AskBrits argue over if being born and raised in Britain makes one British

Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/AskBrits/comments/1jnwsuo/who_is_more_british_an_american_of_english

HIGHLIGHTS

Not really he has no English dna

>What is English DNA? Is it the when the Roman's invaded or the Saxon's or the Norse or the francs or is op not allowed to be English because he's got darker skin, frick your DNA

Western European. Can you show me a genetically Pure person?

You might want to be careful with how you are phrasing things, unless you are trying to sound like a racist

The racist are the other people here tbh seems they hate white people

And there we go, you said it out loud. Can't see anything in here about hating white people, saying an American isn't British isn't racist. Going on about dna is idiotic too, as technically you are more chimp than British

>If we're doing it by that, no one's English or American. The amount of times we've been invaded pretty much guarantees that no one has full English DNA. Most are probably split up between Saxon heritage, Scandinavian heritage and Germanic, generally speaking.

Who does have pure DNa in the world then mate?

Thank you for seeing the point :) fricking no one, so stop caring about DNA and origins xD

Ok say that to the Israeli Palestinian or china Tibet mood then lol

Has it? Pretty sure English fought of sometimes successfully sometimes not many foreign invaders/settlers from 0-1066. They weren't keen on immigrants back then it seems

>You've just confused the word invader with immigrant, two seperate people's.

Some were settlers, Dane's for instance, they just wanted to farm and live there, the native Brits at the time didn't welcome them

The Danes didn't come peacefully at first, they sent raiding parties that would sack villages. They didn't accept the Christian God and believed their gods were in a battle with all other gods.

Does that make my statement incorrect? The English still didn't want them there

Your statement is irrelevant because you're talking about events that happened in the 8th and 9th centuries. England didn't even exist until the 10th century so you clearly don't know the terminology of the time period you're so avidly using to argue your point which renders anything else you have to say redundant.

>This guy is conflating invading forces with peaceful immigration.

Some came peacefully, some of the Dane's tried settling the east coast peacefully, and the English still fought them. Not welcoming behaviour

You are forcing it trying your best to be 'technically' correct but what you are implying is wild. Take a moment to reflect.

But I am correct 👍

So you are happy with saying in a public forum that Brits are inherently anti-immigrant because of things that happened over a thousand years ago?

I don't think being born in Britain makes your ethnicity British. Your friend is literally more British due to his heritage

>There's no such thing as British ethnicity 😂 it's a nationality. Anyone born and raised in the UK is British.

So likewise if I, a white dude, was born and raised in India that makes me more Indian than OP?

Yes, it does

Okay, I'll tell the people in Southern California I'm more Mexican than they are because I'm a white dude born in Mexico City.

Yeah that's how it works, geographically

Here's a good follow up question: Who on average contributes more to the genocide of ethnic Brit's, a white American taxpayer with British ancestry or an Indian living in Britain?

>Where's there a genocide of ethnic Brits?

It's all over Britain. Genocide is defined as 'acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group'. If you listen to what people in power say you might miss their intent or their bosses intent, but if you look at their actions everything aligns with wiping ethnic Brits off of the planet as fast as practically possible, total numbers are plummeting without an end in sight. You may feel ethnic Brits don't have enemies that would so such a thing but many very serious people have very serious animosity towards the ethnic Brits.

"It's all over Britain" Such as? "Genocide is defined as 'acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group'. If you listen to what people in power say you might miss their intent or their bosses intent, but if you look at their actions everything aligns with wiping ethnic Brits off of the planet as fast as practically possible, total numbers are plummeting without an end in sight" So which acts are being committed for what reason, exactly? Or are we just talking about your own bad vibes and feefees? "You may feel ethnic Brits don't have enemies that would so such a thing but many very serious people have very serious animosity towards the ethnic Brits." Very serious people such as whom?

Numbers of ethnic British are falling with no end in sight all over Britain. Paying people to immigrate, standard of living reduction, demoralization via media are all done to remove ethnic British from the planet. Many groups are happy to partake in the extinction and liquidation of the ethnic British, Jews play a leading role.

You British Indian

>Just British is sufficient. British with Indian heritage perhaps?

I've used the exact same words OP used to describe himself so go cry to somebody else about being offended 🙄

lol who said I was offended? Seems like you're desperate for me to be so.

I couldn't care less whether you're offended or not but if you aren't, then what's the issue?

There's no issue just a conversation. "British Indian" felt like an unnecessary qualification.

[Britain is a melting pot. Romans, Saxons, vikings, French, Germans, Indians all made the place home. You are part of that and very much British.

Americans have a odd concept of belonging to somewhere they have never been but their forefathers came from. It's ridiculous to the rest of the world. You are British.](https://old.reddit.com/r/AskBrits/comments/1jnwsuo/who_is_more_british_an_american_of_english/mkn99on/?context=8)

>Not english

If they were raised in England then they'd also be English.

So Palestinians raised in Israel are isreali??

That's something else entirely as there's a whole conflict going on of which a small part of that is self identification.

Cop out mate, are they not born there??

It's about culture, values etc. I think a better example would be someone born in NI to Irish parents and part of the community that leans towards ROI culture, language, food, faith, etc. In both NI and Israel there is contention over whose land it is, and multiple groups with very different cultures at play. There are some unifying elements between cultures, but are generally quite distinct. It isn't really a fair example to give and to know it.

The American is more English as that's an ethnic group, You're more British because you are actually British,

>Americans are not English. Don't be stupid, they are American

An American born to English parents is ethnically English (not that any of them would ever admit that). This is not mutually exclusive with being an American. Don't be stupid.

Luckily in England we do not use the Nuremberg laws

It's not a difficult concept to grasp. I'm not sure what your contention is here, do you really believe that English can't possibly be an ethnic group?

But how does that work? People in the south of England have different genetics to people in the north, who are different to people in the west of England

You're 100% more British. India was British more recently than America was British for a start. He's a white American of British decent. You're a British person who happens to be brown.

>So you're saying the American is only 50% British?

Nah they're 100% American

But if he's 100% more British, the American is only half as British as him. So if we agree OP is 100% British, the American is then 50% British. That's how percentages work.

In the phrase "I'm 100% more British", "100%" is being used as a synonym for "definitely". In context, it's clear this is what was meant as this is a very common phrase. That's how conversations work.

Anyone born and raised in Britain is more British then an American who has never been to Britain

>nope!

Which American is more British than a British person?

the ones with our blood.

Frick. Americans are stealing our blood? We should get Van Helsing to investigate this urgently

Neither of you is British in any way.

>He was born in Britain so is completely British, you weirdo

Not how that works, Hugo weaving is not Nigerian, you do not magically become an identity because of the location of your mother when you were born

OP was born and raised here, so he is British. If his mother left the next day then yeah he wouldn't be British.

Axel rudakabana was born and raised in Britain, he had two Rwandan parents who were not British, he is not British. Being born in an area does not make you a culture that is native to said area.

How is he not British?

https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1jofobh/who_on_average_contributes_more_to_the_genocide/