https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y79iz3ufZbg
!historychads we should celebrate this !ifrickinglovescience achievement
!historychads we should celebrate this !ifrickinglovescience achievement
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, I agree it's not a moral argument. But generals and officers are human beings, prone to human errors and biases. If a country is brutalized, don't expect its inhabitants will make rational moral decisions.
Take the strategic bombing of Berlin by the RAF (diverging from the Ruhr campaign), it wasn't rational, but it was an intrinsically human decision made by people without hindsight. London was bombed by the Luftwaffe so the Germans should suffer the same, that was the general sentiment in Britain.
War is incredibly messy and brings up the worst in people, in the case of WW2 the best course of action was to defeat the Axis at any cost because their goals were unarguably evil. I'll not pass moral judgements on those generals and political leaders who were forced to deal with that awful situation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm just doing my normal thing (Catholic fun fact posting about a monastery and Saint ) and you and @BushWasRight decided to be all serious about war. He is correct that the traditional "just war" doctrine dates back to Augustine who I think nicked it from a Roman.
Ecumenical councils are the highest authority in Tradition, and Vatican II did not mince words in condemning the bombs. Obviously the decision at the time and the postwar culture influence these things in how we view them, but Gaudium et Spes sections 80-82 are the newest entry in Catholic teaching on the subject. It's too long to quote but would only take a minute to read.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sometimes I forget most of your arguments and posts are of ecclesiastical nature.
By the way, I have some LATAM church related news for you. The commie sandinista dictator and Maduro ally, Daniel Ortega is imprisoning priests again (he did a Church crackdown a few years ago) while launching new attacks against the church for not submitting to his rule.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!Catholics check out Gaudium et Spes sections 79-82 for the authoritative and binding positions on war, the nuclear bombs, and the arms race.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sorry, but I think we need more nukes, not fewer and that applies to the US. And Brazil should have an arsenal of at least 500 warheads along a nuclear triad.
!macacos !anticommunists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But yes, I am rarely posting out of "how is this related to Catholicism" character and that's part of why I make people so mad on this site, Catholics who want to pick and choose what parts to follow included. Between that and talking about my family situation which irks the chuds/biofoids users I induce rage amongst a huge % of the userbase without much effort.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!nooticers thoughts on Corinthian?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
is he Catholic? invite him to !babykillers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't he'll take the joke but you're free to try.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I had no idea he annoyed people
@Corinthian can you link me to some of your greatest hits?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Drama with @DeforesterCarpathian which ended poorly for the catholic and then a successful rage bait over abortion and calvinism with a bunch of users.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Takes himself a lil too seriously tbh
But overall a good sport
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The yellow fever guy? I'm okay with him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
É por isso que a minha mãe me levou pra receber a vacina contra a febre amarela quando eu era pequeno.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
literally who
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Who?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Weirdo, but overall fine.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He's genuine and has a good heart, but he's also proof that christcucks can be as cringe as fedora atheists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Protestants, you mean.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
World Wars fought since nukes:
0
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
All countries should have nukes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong, some should and most shouldn't.
Brazil should be the sole nuclear power of South America. Spain should have also have nukes but Portugal shouldn't as Spain is the bigger one in the Iberian Peninsula, this gives paellacels the mandate of heaven over bacalhaus.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Didn't know you were a Duginist, based tbh
With that being said, Portugal shouldn't exist and there should be an Iberian Federation, so I agree with you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
yes don't spend you're money and time fighting wars!
spend them on the church instead.
@CountNosfarakeet say this as a feminist ally
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context