A couple weeks ago, Scott wrote a blog discussing the availability of GLP-1 agonist drugs like Ozempic and how the FDA's actions might price consumers out of the drugs they now depend on. Vaguely interesting, as are most of Scott's blogs on topics on the periphery of healthcare. But of course, being a topic about fats it also encourages fat logic.
One commenter named Bob gave the sage advice to consume less calories, which actually caused Scott to bite on the comment:
Buckle in, because now we're in longpostville:
Scott continuing to bullshit around what is being said and focusing on mass rather than calories
This person claims whether he goes over or under his caloric budget depends entirely on whether he licks his spoon clean of the last dollop of yogurt
This guy compares eating less to literal self flagellation. Surprisingly his comment was quite concise for an ACT post
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thermodynamics is about energy you fricking r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Being hungry as a fat person while trying not to eat is the same as having to pee and holding your pee in!"
Not only does Scott frick up the Law of Thermodynamics comparison he fricks up the comparison between two biological systems as well.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Rationalist" btw
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Mass and energy are equivalent, so adipose tissue is literally the same as water weight.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Are you even really fat if your stomach can't proton decay your food for energy?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context