Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like how the article itself is just some boring centrist columnist answering letters from readers and he concludes that

But suppose you were among those who viewed him as a traitor. To have extended the indictment to his supporters would have been to criminalize political disagreement. Besides, if voting for someone who has done bad things makes you guilty of them, most voters are in deep trouble. It's easy to be inflamed by someone with a habit of making inflammatory statements. But there may be a cost when you deem those who vote for the other side as ''the enemy from within.'' That's a term that Trump has freely employed, of course. You'll want to ask yourself whether protecting democracy is best served by adopting this attitude.

But literally no one actually read anything but the title and now they're acting like NYT is calling for the fascist drumf voters to be tossed in gulags and agreeing and disagreeing based on that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>should we lock up and incarcerate 71 million americans

>filibuster for paragraphs

>conclusion well maybe

We're the good guys!!!!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

conclusion well maybe

Maybe media literacy is a problem after all

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dude literally ends with a maybe to his own stupid question of whether to hang all trump supporters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>thinking the author's position in the final paragraph is even remotely vague or in favor of hanging all trump supportors

:#marseybrainlet:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>we dont want to hang trump supporters

>just accuse them of treason and let our own people decide what that means teehee

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.