svgathey/them 4mo ago#7419013
spent 0 currency on pings
I like how the article itself is just some boring centrist columnist answering letters from readers and he concludes that
But suppose you were among those who viewed him as a traitor. To have extended the indictment to his supporters would have been to criminalize political disagreement. Besides, if voting for someone who has done bad things makes you guilty of them, most voters are in deep trouble. It's easy to be inflamed by someone with a habit of making inflammatory statements. But there may be a cost when you deem those who vote for the other side as ''the enemy from within.'' That's a term that Trump has freely employed, of course. You'll want to ask yourself whether protecting democracy is best served by adopting this attitude.
But literally no one actually read anything but the title and now they're acting like NYT is calling for the fascist drumf voters to be tossed in gulags and agreeing and disagreeing based on that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I like how the article itself is just some boring centrist columnist answering letters from readers and he concludes that
But literally no one actually read anything but the title and now they're acting like NYT is calling for the fascist drumf voters to be tossed in gulags and agreeing and disagreeing based on that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We're the good guys!!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe media literacy is a problem after all
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dude literally ends with a maybe to his own stupid question of whether to hang all trump supporters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context