https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1imidko/she_would_have_had_somewhere_around_the_70_of_the/
Nathan from data-driven Election Truth Alliance (ETA), who has a background in cybersecurity, provides an overview of the research and analysis ETA has conducted on the questionable 2024 elections. At 13:09 he is asked what percentage of people does ETA believe actually voted for Harris. Nathan responds that based on their analysis, Harris would have won at least 5 swing states and would have had about 70% of the popular vote (had the election results not been tampered with).
Give ETA some love and support:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isn't Election Truth Alliance a group of nobodies that has only existed for 2 months? Why are the quoting "Nathan from ETA" without a last name so no one can look into his "background in cybersecurity" (he installed Microsoft Security Essentials on his PC)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context