https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1imidko/she_would_have_had_somewhere_around_the_70_of_the/
Nathan from data-driven Election Truth Alliance (ETA), who has a background in cybersecurity, provides an overview of the research and analysis ETA has conducted on the questionable 2024 elections. At 13:09 he is asked what percentage of people does ETA believe actually voted for Harris. Nathan responds that based on their analysis, Harris would have won at least 5 swing states and would have had about 70% of the popular vote (had the election results not been tampered with).
Give ETA some love and support:
AT LEAST 5 SWING STATES
70% POPULAR VOTE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
She may not have won 70% of our votes, but she won 100% of our hearts!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
/u/Creepy-Team6442 if you don't understand that the Kamala-mania of July 2024 was an astroturfed piece of social engineering, you are too r-slurred to breathe, let alone vote. Kamala was an abject failure in 2020, and remained as popular as a turd in a jacuzzi.
Also, using "trumpty" to insult Donald is more pathetic than using "drumpf".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Quick reminder they knew Biden was sun downing for two years but knew Kamala was so unlikeable they tried running him again than centering on her lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's a style of soft proof along the lines of "the moon landing can't have been faked because faking a moon landing is infinitely harder than going to the moon" that completely escapes people. If there was a single chance Kammy was anything other than a party killer they would have moved Joe out ASAP.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And then they poured a bunch of rich people's money into it shaming anyone who disagreed with George Clooney and now Trump has like a 60% approval rating.
Yikes for progress
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and the "avengers"...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's r-slurred. Joe was a brilliant president with universal support, the fact they pushed for Kamala would be proof that they were completely deluded.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The moon landing wasn't fake but I wish it was
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why do you want to erase the only magical thing we've achieved as a species?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Im pretty sure everyone mr. 6th street sola sopa talks to on a daily basis within one mile of his effciency studio apartment supported kamala
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
True !khive beliver!
Best part is how team kamala internal pools showed her getting whipped as badly as she did. But also incredibly popular?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think its a combination of surbanites who cut off any who disagreed and reddit bots
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
But the excitement! Thousands of totally legitimate upmarseyrinos on my heckin' /r/pics post of flipping off the BIG MANGO tower!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Kamala won. Get over it BIPOC.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
but didnt you have a "brat summer"...plus "dark brandon" told me she was the most qualified...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Even blowout elections like 1972 and 1984 were only 60%. These people are too r-slurred to even get near a plausible lie.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jesus Christ at the audacity to claim 70%
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/presidential-election-mandates
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jeb Bush would have had 100%, had he ever been a candidate and everyone voted for him.
Something is wrong. The American people must acknowledge this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They're commies, on commie countries 90% is the low end.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
FRICK FRICK FRICK FRICK NOT ANOTHER LETTER, THEY'VE ALMOST REACHED THE 1,000,000 LETTERS NEEDED TO ACTIVATE THE SUPER-SECRET 28th AMENDMENT THAT WAS DRAFTED UNDER THE FIRST NEW BLOOD MOON OF THE YEAR WHICH STATES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CAN BE REMOVED AND PUBLICLY EXECUTED AFTER ONE MILLION FACEBOOK SIGNATURES HAVE BEEN GATHERED.
These tactics haven't been used since the ancient year of 2006 A.D.
It's over in ways it's never been over before.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That and judges is all they have left lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
How did Drumpf get away with this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The only logical conclusion would be that both Biden and Harris were in on it.
It was an inside job!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I unironically believe Jill Biden was feeding intel to the Trump campaign. She hates Kamala with the fire of a thousand suns, so that was her revenge.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Downdongered and zero replies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
70% is an insanely r-slurred number and was not made by anyone who has even the most basic knowledge about past elections:
1964, LBJ gets 61.1% of the popular vote
1972, Nixon gets 60.7% of the popular vote
1984, Reagan gets 58.8% of the popular vote
For an example of a candidate who got almost 70% of the popular vote:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It is 70% if you're only source is reddit banning anything positive for trump.
No trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Source: Reddit comments
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Source: I didn't vote for him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
"Candidate who lost the primary vote was totally popular, you guys. Trust me, I know what I'm talking about with politics; I have a degree in CYBERSECURITY"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!codecels
Why are cybersecurity ppl uniquely regarded?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There are three kinds of cybersecuritycels:
1. The IT Veteran. He knows everything there is to know about Exchange servers and then some. He has a AS in Information Technology from Butler Community College. He can quote The Website Is Down and The IT Crowd from memory. He does so without any sense of shame or self-consciousness. He is intellectually unsophisticated, chronically underappreciated, crucial to his employer's well-being, and extremely cranky about it. His posts are stupid because he is rageposting.
2. The security developer. He has contributed to a major Rust library and knows how Kubernetes works. He will write sentences like "We shrank all the nodes, which of course prevented a quorum, so we lost all the secrets!" Even though you have a EECS degree from Cal, you aren't quite sure what that means. You hope you can discuss it in your next 1:1, but he is going to use the time to come out as trans instead. He is intelligent and capable, but he is extremely, profoundly neurodivergent. His posts are stupid because he cannot imagine the inside of an audience member's head.
3. The "cybersecurity expert." He has a MS in Cybersecurity from some university you have heard of. He cannot write a Hello, World program, or solve FizzBuzz. He is certain that his inferiors, those knuckle-dragging apes on the "tech" team, can implement his brilliant checklist-based security proposals. He privately wishes he understood software, but self-soothes by saying he chose to study something more important. His posts are stupid because he is stupid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I feel like a fourth type feels like a badass because he knows what a "stack overflow" is and goes to defcon every year.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
PlsRope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Because cybersecurity is a meme tier IT career. 95% of it is just made up acronyms and bullshit and has little or nothing to do with actually hardening security.
Its the HR of STEM careers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Because he took a one week CompTIA+ training and passed a 1 hr test. So you WILL call him Doctor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That would be hilarious if he didn't even get an actual degree lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Would be more respectable than spending 3 years learning how to send out emails asking you to enable 2FA
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You don't need one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You dont need one but claiming to have one but it's just CompTIA is a very funny move
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh I made that up as an example of one way to claim cyber security expert
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're one of the good ones
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This site needs more IT Ops representation.
I mean we have
but they seem unemployed 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Im a server janny which should count
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Both candidates played a great game here tbh. Kamala for managing to win 70% of the vote despite her campaign being just 4 months of hanging out with Liz Cheney, and Trump for figuring out how to suppress one in three of those votes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I think !chuds should actually want a female president, because then Dems can shut the frick about having the first one, e.g. the UK where despite cuckoldry, identity doesn't come into debates about presidents/prime-ministry
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
surfer mommy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The GOP needs to run an under 50, fit, fiscally conservative Latinx, just so I can watch libs heads spin.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"I can't believe Nixon won. I don't know anyone who voted for him."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Isn't Election Truth Alliance a group of nobodies that has only existed for 2 months? Why are the quoting "Nathan from ETA" without a last name so no one can look into his "background in cybersecurity" (he installed Microsoft Security Essentials on his PC)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's inconcievable that people outside my bubble think differently than me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm really curious how polling never indicated Kamala having more than double the votes Trump had. Were those also tampered with?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
i'm so fricking tired of these people. they've been doing this shit since 2016 but at the same time act like the right doing the exact same thing was a threat to democracy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1imidko/comment/mc3lqti/?context=8
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
/u/schlormo nobody's calling this a "conspiracy theory", it's just a really r-slurred take by an arch-linux user
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
2024 was the most important election in American herstory, why didn't all those pro Kamala voters go to the polls?
Even the right wing death squads roaming my backwater hick town didn't stop me and my buddies from going down and votin' for Oakland Kam'.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
No trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Only 2 starlink comments this time, I'm surprised. I though their raging musk-o-boner hate sticks would have brought it up more often.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
We will work together, and continue to work together, to address these issues... and to work together as we continue to work, operating from the new norms, rules, and agreements, that we will convene to work together... we will work on this together.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1imidko/she_would_have_had_somewhere_around_the_70_of_the/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context