https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1imidko/she_would_have_had_somewhere_around_the_70_of_the/
Nathan from data-driven Election Truth Alliance (ETA), who has a background in cybersecurity, provides an overview of the research and analysis ETA has conducted on the questionable 2024 elections. At 13:09 he is asked what percentage of people does ETA believe actually voted for Harris. Nathan responds that based on their analysis, Harris would have won at least 5 swing states and would have had about 70% of the popular vote (had the election results not been tampered with).
Give ETA some love and support:
AT LEAST 5 SWING STATES
70% POPULAR VOTE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Candidate who lost the primary vote was totally popular, you guys. Trust me, I know what I'm talking about with politics; I have a degree in CYBERSECURITY"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!codecels
Why are cybersecurity ppl uniquely regarded?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There are three kinds of cybersecuritycels:
1. The IT Veteran. He knows everything there is to know about Exchange servers and then some. He has a AS in Information Technology from Butler Community College. He can quote The Website Is Down and The IT Crowd from memory. He does so without any sense of shame or self-consciousness. He is intellectually unsophisticated, chronically underappreciated, crucial to his employer's well-being, and extremely cranky about it. His posts are stupid because he is rageposting.
2. The security developer. He has contributed to a major Rust library and knows how Kubernetes works. He will write sentences like "We shrank all the nodes, which of course prevented a quorum, so we lost all the secrets!" Even though you have a EECS degree from Cal, you aren't quite sure what that means. You hope you can discuss it in your next 1:1, but he is going to use the time to come out as trans instead. He is intelligent and capable, but he is extremely, profoundly neurodivergent. His posts are stupid because he cannot imagine the inside of an audience member's head.
3. The "cybersecurity expert." He has a MS in Cybersecurity from some university you have heard of. He cannot write a Hello, World program, or solve FizzBuzz. He is certain that his inferiors, those knuckle-dragging apes on the "tech" team, can implement his brilliant checklist-based security proposals. He privately wishes he understood software, but self-soothes by saying he chose to study something more important. His posts are stupid because he is stupid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I feel like a fourth type feels like a badass because he knows what a "stack overflow" is and goes to defcon every year.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
PlsRope
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Because he took a one week CompTIA+ training and passed a 1 hr test. So you WILL call him Doctor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That would be hilarious if he didn't even get an actual degree lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Would be more respectable than spending 3 years learning how to send out emails asking you to enable 2FA
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You don't need one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You dont need one but claiming to have one but it's just CompTIA is a very funny move
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh I made that up as an example of one way to claim cyber security expert
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Because cybersecurity is a meme tier IT career. 95% of it is just made up acronyms and bullshit and has little or nothing to do with actually hardening security.
Its the HR of STEM careers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're one of the good ones
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This site needs more IT Ops representation.
I mean we have
but they seem unemployed 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Im a server janny which should count
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context