I finally watched A Clockwork Orange all the way through. I tried watching it before several times but was always put off by it feeling like I'm watching gratuitous misery porn. Well, I must say that on actually finishing it my opinion of the film has significantly improved. I somewhat enjoyed the story, and I can see that there was an attempt to convey some greater message, but to me it feels a bit vapid, like it makes a statement but then fails to explore it in any meaningful way. This made me feel like the movie is a bit empty- by the end the main character is barely different from the man he was in the beginning, and similarly I feel no wiser than when I started watching this film. I know that there was an entire chapter of the book cut out from the film, and I'm wondering if having it be left in would have given me a better sense of closure for this story.
I will say that the film is very memorable if anything, and the world in which it takes place stands out in being neither too foreign nor mundane which I liked.
The point is (partially) lack of closure. You grew sympathetic toward literally the worst character you have ever seen on the screen and then bammo, it's all torn away as you realise Alex is still the same filth as before. Roll credits. No time to breathe.
Yea I get that and I think it's a very interesting idea for storytelling, but for some reason the execution just didn't resonate with me. Maybe it's the 'tism cause I didn't particularly empathise with Alex, even as he was tortured. I merely saw his captors as the bigger fish in that scenario.
Oh well, maybe this says more about me than the film itself
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I finally watched A Clockwork Orange all the way through. I tried watching it before several times but was always put off by it feeling like I'm watching gratuitous misery porn. Well, I must say that on actually finishing it my opinion of the film has significantly improved. I somewhat enjoyed the story, and I can see that there was an attempt to convey some greater message, but to me it feels a bit vapid, like it makes a statement but then fails to explore it in any meaningful way. This made me feel like the movie is a bit empty- by the end the main character is barely different from the man he was in the beginning, and similarly I feel no wiser than when I started watching this film. I know that there was an entire chapter of the book cut out from the film, and I'm wondering if having it be left in would have given me a better sense of closure for this story.
I will say that the film is very memorable if anything, and the world in which it takes place stands out in being neither too foreign nor mundane which I liked.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The point is (partially) lack of closure. You grew sympathetic toward literally the worst character you have ever seen on the screen and then bammo, it's all torn away as you realise Alex is still the same filth as before. Roll credits. No time to breathe.
Kubrick is the goat
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yea I get that and I think it's a very interesting idea for storytelling, but for some reason the execution just didn't resonate with me. Maybe it's the 'tism cause I didn't particularly empathise with Alex, even as he was tortured. I merely saw his captors as the bigger fish in that scenario.
Oh well, maybe this says more about me than the film itself
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context