Why are wingcucks an issue on this site if we have representation for all sides? Doesn’t making that argument go against what you stand for here, where you prioritize taking down individuals rather than accepting them as part of a disfunctional centrist whole? The issue I'm discussing now isn't whether or not you are shilling a "wingcuck party" (which is up for debate), it's that you are shilling a party that consists of the very people you claim to be against and delibrately choosing to overlook those people because a party which we know barely anything about and that hasn't done anything claims to be centrist. What a hypocrite.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@WingcuckExterminator is shilling a party now and chuds have been unbanned. Looks like wingcucks are here to stay.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The party still consists of wingcucks. Didn't you read the announcement?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are wingcucks an issue on this site if we have representation for all sides? Doesn’t making that argument go against what you stand for here, where you prioritize taking down individuals rather than accepting them as part of a disfunctional centrist whole? The issue I'm discussing now isn't whether or not you are shilling a "wingcuck party" (which is up for debate), it's that you are shilling a party that consists of the very people you claim to be against and delibrately choosing to overlook those people because a party which we know barely anything about and that hasn't done anything claims to be centrist. What a hypocrite.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context