Unable to load image

@Fabrico's recommended books for political moderates.

There are a good deal many nonfiction books talking about modern politics, most of them suck and have nothing of importance to say. This list composes of books that at the very least have some food for thought. I have read most of these, though not all fully. Most of these books have audiobook versions, which are useful for those of you who prefer that format. Many libraries have access to these books in both formats. !grillers you should ideally read/have read a few of these, !burgers you should do the same, as your civic duty. Also, a shoutout to @pizzashill for recommending some of these years ago on the subreddit.

Suspicious Minds by Rob Brotherton

 A great book that explains the mindset for believing the unbelievable, a good book for anyone who interacts with conspiracy theorists with any regularity.

Vodka Politics by Mark Lawrence Schrad

 This a good book that provides key insight into not only the Russian government, but the people who passively support the current regime. A good showcase on how the best way to deal with Russia geopolitically is to first understand the state, and it's history of oppression and control.

The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli

 Many people have a misunderstanding of The Prince, believing it to be a personal manifesto of Machiavelli's ideas. This is false, the book is mostly an observation of the states he saw around him, and what made some function and others falter. Machiavelli is not supporting these ideas from a moral standpoint, but a pragmatic one.

The End of Race Politics: Arguments for a Colorblind America by Coleman Hughes

When I heard some Zoomer with a YouTube channel wrote a book, I rolled my eyes. However this is actually an impressive breakdown on why modern IdPol is cancer to society and how two wrongs don't make a right. It helps that he is good at narrating his own audiobook, highly recommend the audio version over the regular book. Probably my favorite book of the year, fiction included.

Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up by Abigail Shrier

 If you have kids (or plan to), I consider this book essential. It provides some key tips for parenting (basically do the opposite of everything Millennial parents do). It's also useful for understanding why Zoomers and gen A are so dysfunctional, the parents did everything wrong. As Zoomers start to enter the political arena, understanding how they function (or rather mostly don't) is key.

Man's Search For Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl

 A guy he survived the holocaust explains how he was able to keep living after what happened to him. Is he the best writer? No. However he has a perspective that the vast majority of westerners don't, an event in life that involved true suffering.

China's Great Wall Of Debt: Shadow Banks, Ghost Cities, Massive Loans, and the End of the Chinese Miracle by Dinny McMahon

 China is screwed, but often it can be hard to understand why when for all appearances they appear to be a functioning almost developed country. People may see all the stats that spell doom and gloom, but without examples it can be hard to internalize. This book is masterful at providing those examples and tying them in to various stats about China's economy and population. The audiobook is also high quality, and 100% free if you have an Audible membership (doesn't cost a credit).

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion by Jonathan Haidt

 If you only read one book here, make it this one. This book perfectly explains the mind of the wingcuck, and explains what one can do to avoid becoming one. It also provides some really uncomfortable ideas that challenged my beliefs and actually made me more moderate.

The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt

 This book is not as well written as The Righteous Mind, however it does have some additional ideas that are worth pondering. Worth a read, but not as essential of a read as The Righteous Mind.

Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life by Jordan B. Peterson

 Jordan B Peterson is no genius, but his ideas have obviously resonated with a lot of people. This book, above all his other books really helps shed light on why. This is probably his most personal book, and shows what kind of person naturally gravitates towards this type of thinking. It helps that it also has more meaningful advice than his first self-help book, less empty platitudes.

Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fate of Human Societies by Jared Diamond

 A lot of modern historians dismiss this book as pseudohistory, I'd argue that whether that's true or not doesn't matter. This book is more useful to explain the mindset of historians and politicians from the decade this book was published. The fact remains that many believe this book to be true regardless of it's actually factuality, and as such it is worth knowing what started this mindset and what the mindset actually is. I will personally add that this book has more truth to it than many modern historians are willing to admit. Most people who dispute this book attack the data, as the conclusion is hard to challenge.

The Case Against Education: Why the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money by Bryan Caplan

 Public school is trash in the USA, this book articulates why in a very matter of fact way. This book doesn't offer much substantial solutions imo. However understanding *why* our education system is broken is a key step to working on creating solutions.

The Bible (LSB)

 The Bible is the most important book ever written, this is undeniable. This book has had such an insane amount of influence not only on religion, science, and culture, but also the fabric of what makes The West a concept to begin with. Many modern readers have trouble getting through the KJV Bible, understandable. Thus I recommend the LSB version, is it as good from a religious or historical aspect? No. However if you have found yourself unable to really get through The Bible due to it's complex prose, the LSB version is a solid option for understanding The Bible. Unfortunately it doesn't have any non-AI complete audio readings, so no audiobook for those who want it.

You may wonder why other religious texts aren't included, and that's because The Bible has value from a culture and historical angle for any Westerner. Other religious texts are less valuable from that angle, and don't have the same amount of influence over the core Western identity as compared to The Bible.

35
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Very Hungry Caterpillar

Written all the way back in the 60's, The Very Hungry Caterpillar is a touchstone of modern bodybuilding culture. With beautiful illustrations it popularized the bulk cut cycle. Essential. 
A very political book, it's rumored that JFK was excited to heavily incorporate this book into America's physical education program which aimed to create a fit America. Full of beautiful jacked butterflies. 

!retards discuss

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I haven't read the whole thing but it was pretty clear there was a pinko subtext there. The caterpillar is a welfare queen who just wants to eat stuff. Maybe there's some plot twist in the last half of it, but I just put it down out of boredom at his quest to eat stuff.

Now if you want a masterpiece, a real masterpiece, obviously: Goodnight Moon

The little bunny acknowledges many different characters from all walks of life. Kittens playing near the pair of mittens. A cow jumping over the moon. Even an old lady whispering hush. That's because the bunny believes in an open society where everyone is free to follow their path in life (jumping over the moon perhaps) without getting permission from the government first. A lot of inanimate objects are mentioned because the bunny is a pragmatist who cares about getting things done in the real world. And yes, there is a bowl full of mush. But that's just one of many items. While the caterpillar is desperate to even get enough food to survive, the bunny lives in a market economy where there is such abundance that a bowl full of mush can be left there and it's only one of many objects mentioned.

I got a message for you commies trying to undermine our way of life with your commie philosophies: If you like crawling around on leaves so much, maybe you can move the heck to Russia. They got a lot of leaves there for a person like you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is a really long way of saying you don't frick.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you would like to read these books, see if your local library is a part of Libby. Libby has a great way to filter audiobooks only, easy to track when your library adds a book you want, and allows you to easily return books.

Also check out https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.literalword.mobile_app for a free way to read the LSB version of The Bible on Android.

Here is a link to The Prince translated to English as a PDF: https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/machiavelli1532.pdf

Here is a link to China's Great Wall of Debt on Audible: https://www.audible.com/pd/Chinas-Great-Wall-of-Debt-Audiobook/B07BH3GJ4Z

And finally here is a link to Coleman Hughes' YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/@ColemanHughesOfficial/videos

If you have any recommendations, let me know. I am always open to good nonfiction book recommendations, regardless if they are about politics or something completely different.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the prince is a good read but dont expect to gain anything from it.

if you want to learn how to rule an italian city state in the late 1400s, then this is your book. otherwise, just read "man, the state, and war" by kenneth waltz.

also somewhat unrelated, but when i was trying to read the prince like 5 years ago, i found this audiobook on youtube. i think !ranchers might recognize this guy's voice

its sargon of akkad

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are there any good books for if I wanted to rule Italy from the 1920s - 1940s?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Mental-R-sluration-Health-Sickness/dp/1578066476

Just make sure to not pick the dumbest choices possible and you'll do better than Mussolini.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://marianamazzucato.com/books/the-value-of-everything/

how economic theory has failed to clearly distinguish between value creation and value extraction.

https://www.shadowstats.com/

John Williams' Shadow Government Statistics" is an electronic newsletter service that exposes and analyzes flaws in current U.S. government economic data and reporting, as well as in certain private-sector numbers, and provides an assessment of underlying economic and financial conditions, net of financial-market and political hype.

!chuds :marseyantiwork:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

how economic theory has failed to clearly distinguish between value creation and value extraction.

Differentiating between value creation and extraction is one of the oldest concepts in economic theory

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That book is more of a rant on modern GDP. It's a good book.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!bookworms come to discuss some non-fiction :#marseyclappingglasses:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt

I read this, it had some good ideas but it was really funny reading it in current year since the authors had no clue just how far their fellow shitlibs would go

!chuds mandatory time capsule reading

12 rules :marseypeterson:

Tbqh I think this guy is a terrible author

Guns Germs Steel

I think this soy manifesto was debunked by Carnage and Culture bb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

GGS is great at explaining things until you hit international trade around the 1500s. All those barriers to development really don't mean shit after that, but amazingly some groups of people still to this day can't figure it out.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What r ur thoughts on it bb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyconfused:

Pretty much what I said. His point about geography as a barrier to trade is a good one. It's not entirely new because economists have their "gravity models" where being next to large trading countries has positive spillover effects on nearby countries. The starting resources bit is mixed. Horses are easier to domesticate than zebras, and llamas are of limited usefulness. True, but maybe different groups of people start with different average IQs. I'm just sayin'.

I can go on. The Incans had their natural barrier problem with llamas and mountains which did stifle advancement, but so did having an neurodivergentsllly centrally planned political economy which forced people to stock warehouses full of clothes that nobody used. His book looks hard at nature but negelects political economic barriers to development. It's a good and long list of explanatory variables for economic development though.

!historychads, my brief thoughts on Guns, Germs, and Steel. Please chime in. :marseyfluffy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People who actually know about biology have told me that part is broadly true. And you can trust them because I said so.

My quibble with him is about the technology he uses as examples. Guns were better than bows (don't even start that conversation with me :marseymad:) but not that much, steel weapons were way better in certain situations but no benefit in others (like if you get shot in the back by a guy you never saw). The more important factors... oh God this is a good idea for a whole book... but to avoid motteposting I'll try to stick to the point. Now keep in mind it's been 25 years since I read it, so maybe he did mention these things and I forgot it.

The real triumph in conquering the Incas wasn't fighting them. It was getting there in the first place. The ships the Spanish were using were like the airliners of today, extremely complex machines built up from millennia of experience with crews to match them. I don't know much about sailing but I read a very persuasive boomer times book that said it needed the combination of technology from the Mediterranean and the North Sea to build a trans-Atlantic ship. They had to navigate, which they did based on a lot of abstract science like astronomy and math. They needed all kinds of material: the right kind of wood, several different metals, textiles for the sails, &ct. For each of these we could delve into how many centuries of experience were required to develop the technology. They needed stuff you would never think of, like high-tech barrels that could keep water from going foul after weeks of travel.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17238734743689737.webp

López de Legazpi-Urdaneta Monument in Manila. Filipinos who aren't bitter Fil-Am incels tend to have a more nuanced understanding of their interactions with other countries in history.

If you were going to pick one thing that made Europe superior to the rest of the worlds, it was ships. By the 1520s Magellan could go around the world. In 1565 Legazpi began to colonize the Philippines. I tried to measure the distance on Google Earth but I couldn't because it's literally on the opposite side of the planet. Three years later the Portugese showed up already and besieged the colony because they could do it too. You can talk all you want about other cultures' big cities and big buildings and art and whatever, but none of them were remotely able to travel to the other side of the planet and be in shape to fight. (Don't even make me start about Zhenge He.)

So I submit that the sailing ship is the tool that actually made Europe powerful. You could easily write an entire book like GGS just about ships.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I haven't read the book but something I think you're overlooking, armor.

A steel sword is better than a bronze sword, or an obsidian sword, but leather armor fails completely compared to metal armor. Advanced armor even managed to make advanced metal swords obsolete as weapons. You give someone good armor, advanced weapons (even if the weapons aren't that much better) and they are basically invulnerable to the more primitive weapons and cultures.

Armor is such a problem to simple weapons that Fiore developed a bunch of jank half swording plays just in an effort to make it kinda work.

Obviously ships, gunpowder played a huge role but don't sleep on protection.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The elaborate plate armor and stuff like that emerged around the 1300s as a response to advanced weapons designed to penetrate armor. Against a low-tech enemy do you really need anything more than leather? I feel people don't appreciate it enough. Back in my 400s BC times that I know about :marseyboomer: everyone used leather for everything and they did fine.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17051203593367493.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I preferred why nations :marseypeacekeeper: fail for better :marseysaulgoodman: economic analysis :marseynatesilverfox:

!bookworms

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why Nations Fail has a right idea but it oversimplifies too much as well. The authors cite "Guns, Germs and Steel" in their prologue saying their book is kind of a rebuttal but then fall into the same vices as the former glossing over things like culture (yes, institutional development is linked too cultural norms, yet the authors act as if institutions exist on a vacuum and just spring out of nowhere in particular). Their takes on the Roman Empire were ridiculous, they attributed the fall of the western empire too events 500 years previous lol. Their chapters on Mexico and Argentina were perfect though (Robinson specialty is LATAM economics so he shined on those themes).

!neolibs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd agree :marseythumbsup: but I don't think :marseynoooticer: a single :marseywall: book gets everything right :marseysoren: besides the communist :marseymarx: manifesto :marseychudnotes:

!commies

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyakshually: The Communist Manifesto is not a book but a pamphlet. :#marseyrevolution:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why did you chud my boy!?!?

:#marseysob:

@C333, ..... :marseygiveup:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because I thought :marseymindblown: it was funny

:#marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pictured: Leopold de Rothschild and his zebra drawn carriage in London retroactively refuting Jared Diamond

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1723865762613301.webp

White extinction is long overdue

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Okay, I'm convinced. Time to burn Diamond at the stake. :marseyburn:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyspitmoji:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Guns, Germs and Steel suffers from "Grand Theory" syndrome. It oversimplifies attributing almost everything to geographical factors. I really recommend "1491" by Charles Mann as reading for those interested in pre-columbian America and the follow-up book "1493" covers the columbian exchange. The books go deep into archeology, contemporary accounts, ecology and some paleoclimatology.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Horses are easier to domesticate than zebras,

I doubt that this was actually true. IMO the real answer is that horses and zebras both started with the ducking reflex, but it was bred out of horses (or the horses that ended up domesticated were the ones that lacked the reflex and got caught) which then escaped and intermingled with wild stock over the millennia until the entire species ended up having significant domestic horse admixture and lost the reflex as a result, especially since large cats were mostly eradicated from the parts of Eurasia that horses inhabited and there was little evolutionary pressure to breed the ducking reflex back into horses.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is this why Aruba (a desert island with no resources) has a higher standard of living than Venezuela next door?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is this why Aruba (a desert island with no resources) has a higher standard of living than Venezuela next door?

Inclusive institutions according to !neolibs Holy Book "Why Nations Fail".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Why Nations Fail

Because they chose socialism.

:#marseysmug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Then they must have just coincidentally developed inclusive institutions all over the Caribbean. They've been remarkable stable politically compared to the rest of the world. The exceptions:

  • Cuba - The biggest island.

  • Haiti - Half of a big island.

  • Grenada - The only outlier I can think of.

The small islands have done way better than the big islands and mainland countries in the region. Could it be because of... geography? :marseythinkorino:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Geography can't explain why the worst economy in the Americas shares an island with the fastest-growing economy in the Americas

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know what the book is about but Aruba is rich the same way many other nothingburger caribbean nations are rich: Money laundering and tourism

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

....so trade?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If we're still talking about OverSeether's critique of the book, then yes, better transportation obviously opened up these islands for tourism, specifically air travel becoming cheap and safe.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I would still explain this through geography (lol of course I would, I'm so quirky that way :marseygiggle:). Venezuela is a big country with millions of people so it's going to end up with big social problems. In Venezuela there's places you can hide. On Aruba you can't be a fugitive more than 5 minutes, so you can't have a civil war. Everyone has to learn to get along with each other.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just to clarify this for people who haven't read it, it's not relevant after the 1500s because that's the whole point of the book, not because he's a tard. How different countries ended up the way they were in the 1500s. He uses the fall of the Incas in the 1530s as the conclusion of the story he's telling.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, sweaty, he extrapolated beyond that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh. I wish he wouldn't have done that because that's... the part that he actually knew some stuff about.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Huh I just read the synopsis. He argued that free societies make the best militaries but the WW1 Wehrmacht was probably the best land army that ever came about, and they were a proto-military dictatorship.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Carnage and Culture or GGS?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

CnC

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>WW1

>Wehrmacht

:#marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Too much pop non-fiction, RETVRN to theory !neolibs

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17238120889404948.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17238151938763.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Keep JK Growling out of here!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd skip Rawls. Normative stuff was taken care of that guy who kept going on about pragmatism. Wasting all those hours on Kant must be the author of that list trolling us. Krugman for neoliberals is hilarious; really don't know why he's on there. If anything, he'd want us to mostly return to 1930s economic policy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mfw most of these that I've read were written before 1800: :marseyboomer:

Some of these you'd need a heck of a lot of context to understand. Like you can't just sit down and read Thucydides. He mentions something like 1000 places in it and a lot of them actually matter. So don't just open it up expecting to read it cover to cover. Just read the parts about politics where they're arguing in one city. The military part of it is totally incomprehensible unless you do a billion hours of research and then it turns out most of it is really fricking boring.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Like you can't just sit down and read Thucydides. He mentions something like 1000 places in it and a lot of them actually matter.

Get The Landmark Thucydides, it has a million footnotes and maps that give you all the context you need

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17238907540405056.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't need to. I made my own. :marseyautism: A sample:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/172392093648112.webp

Don't ask me how long this took.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know why Inty recommends Nozick when he 100% despises Rothbard.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

-- Jonathan Haidt :marseythumbsup:

My only quibble with him is that he doesn't want to let people be anonymous on the internet. He's smart but this is a guy who grew up long before the internet and he's out of his depth when he thinks about it. The ideal coauthor for him would be our very own Snallygaster who runs circles around these geezers in terms of understanding the psychology of people on the internet and how they interact.

-- Guns, Germs and Steel :marseyconquistador: :marseycherokee:

When I first came to reddit I went on one of the big history subreddits. Looked around for a little while. Found that if anyone ever mentions this book a bot will come and scold them and tell you it's racist. I see r-sluration here all day every day but this might be the most r-slurred thing I've ever seen. The whole point of his book is that he's not racist so he's trying to explain why some cultures conquered others even though all people are pretty much the same. I think the hate comes from people who are trying to change the definition of racism into "saying that PoC ever did something wrong or make a mistake". I guarantee Diamond is less racist than a woke redditor who moved to Portland and got into craft brewing because he has social anxiety whenever he has to actually meet a black person.

As for its accuracy, I read it last century shortly after it came out :marseyboomer: and even as a kid there were a few things I doubted. Like I don't think that steel weapons would give such a big advantage to the conquistadors. But the answers he gives to the big questions are undeniably true. Maybe another reason for the hate is that he's saying geography shapes our cultures. There are branches of social science that will go apeshit over this because they want whatever they're studying to be what shapes our culture. And to be blunt, they're not very good at geography so if they admitted it was important it would undercut their own jobs.

-- Redactor's picks

My recommendation is Ulysses S. Grant's memoirs. Regarded as a masterpiece by intellectuals and selling more than any other book besides the bible, it's like a movie that has a 100% rating from both reviewers and audiences on Rotten Tomatoes. It's very relevant to today, at least if you're an American. This guy lived a whole life in this country experiencing a heck of a lot. Being a junior officer, a failed shop owner, general and savior of the republic, president. He did all that and he was also good at writing. Through his eyes you can see the building of the foundation that modern America rests on. You can see our country before 20th century ideologies and Che Guevara T-shirts and Twitter. And this all being told from one of the most American goddarn people who have ever lived.

I don't read as many books as I used to, but I have a couple blog/podcasts to recommend.

Yascha Mounk - Persuasion. His entire project is centrism and giving everyone a voice. It is 100% unironically basically rDrama except with politeness and distinguished intellectuals instead of calling each other r-slurs and cute twinks and hiding behind a cloak of anonymity in our mom's basement. He's trying to get back to the old days that I remember from my childhood, where if you disagreed someone you would talk about it with them, not tell HR that they did a microagression and get them fired. He's got lots of classy guests from all different fields, like Jonathan Haidt who has been on it a few times.

Ruy Teixeira - The Liberal Patriot. This is the guy who wrote The Emerging Democratic Majority in 2002, a book about the opportunities for the Democratic party from demographic changes in America that will come soon. A generation of r-slurs (I know a few) interpreted this as "you will magically win every election if you alienate white males". Since then he's watched the Democrats frick up everything and desperately tried to undo the damage he accidentally caused. As the party has drifted farther and farther to the left, he's stayed where he is and ended up in the center. He has the spirit that I remember the Democrats had back in my boomer times.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17225430325674362.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17237841265885043.webp

I am exclusively motivated by disgust :marseyishygddt: and intensely conflict :marseynoyouoccupy: avoidant, I refuse :marseyrejecthug: to abide by social :marseyredcheck: norms and will never :marseyitsover: wash my peepee. I will never :marseyitsover: amount to anything, due in large :marseyslimepink: part to being a college :marseymcwagie: educated snowflake, and yet I am incomprehensibly less of an r-slured :marseycrayoneater: loser :marseyl: than haidt and peterson. !commenters !zoomers

:#marseygigachadtalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The End of History and the Last Man by Francis Fukuyama

Man, did he nail it!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao that should probably be added, not because it's right...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's still interesting from a time-capsule sort of view on how unbelievably confident and assured the political and financial class were that Western global neoliberalism would reign supreme in the wake of the end of the Cold War. Points towards how many warning signs were ignored

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He was basically correct, balancing the struggle for recognition with material progress :marseylgbtflag5: makes for a perfectly satisfactory politics, and history :marseyww1american1: shows no signs :marseymoney: of restarting in the first :marseywinner: world :marseyww1french2: (poors need not apply)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysalendofherstory:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Bible (LSB)

only version worth reading is The Word On The Street, an ebonics paraphrase version (yes its real)


Economy And Society by Max Weber is a must read also

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Word On The Street

It even has an Audio CD! https://www.amazon.com/word-street-pack-Zondervan/dp/0310933587/ for $30...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's on Spotify premium! At least the essential parts. I'm currently listening to the first part "stuff starts up" and it's pretty good. Nice soundtrack

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Coddling was absolutely terrible. I can't believe I paid to read 100+ pages of pearl clutching.

The Righteous Mind is one of my favorites. Thinking, Fast and Slow is another good book along the same lines.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah either Haidt is one of the most inconsistent writers of all time or Greg Lukianoff is a shit writer (probably both).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thinking, Fast and Slow

Wasn't this book absolutely obliterated by the replication crisis?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335312555_Not_lost_in_translation_Successfully_replicating_Prospect_Theory_in_19_countries

Kahnemam states on his book that it is the specific product of his research and admitted there are problems with replication as it tends to be with psychology in general. Apparently some experiments managed to be replicated.

It's a interesting book regardless, just don't take it 100% as the TRUTH, at least Kahneman is not a quack stating his work is the absolute settled SCIENCE™.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!commenters

Only economics book you need to read

https://saifedean.com/tbs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>This book is a serious work of political analysis, and I do not have the time or inclination to write a serious review.

>The book is a waste of time.

>For anyone who is serious about making progress in the world should read The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion by Jonathan Haidt

You're supposed to link the pdf or some shit not just say that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I tend to curate my reading material a bit more strictly. Which Harry Potter book do you recommend for political insight?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17238076684054842.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

half blood prince

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I read Harry potter on the sly and I can tell you half blood prince is definitely the most political. If you read book 5 without the proper context you are guaranteed to be on reddit within a year.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So I should :marseynorm: read Askaban instead?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I would just keep your child in the dark about book 5 for their own safety

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Order of the Phoenix (unironically)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why Nations Fail is a better GG&S, also I would highly recommend The Dictators Handbook

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Solid list. Vodka politics is great. I'd add Collapse by Vladislov M Zubok. It's a play by play of the collapse of the USSR. I'd also recommend Death of Expertise, and Our Own Worst Enemy by Tom Nichols. Finally I'd recommend Secret City, the History of Gay Washington. More that it's an interesting book. The audio book is read in this really catty tone, highly recommend.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Case Against Education: Why the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money by Bryan Caplan

Its a baby sitting system so that works

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tbh it's not even very good at babysitting. School should be reformed to be better at both imo.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why we need mayocide.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.