!bookworms Smugposting thread for our litcels 
Which books and authors do you think are filters for plebs?
/h/lit
.webp?h=11 "Top Hat (black) - Traditional. Classy. Elegant.")
nuclearshill
gau/cho
aweonao
9d ago
(image post)
449 thread views
#352737
earned 200 coins from votes
aweonao
9d ago
(image post)
449 thread views
#352737
earned 200 coins from votes
Filter literature thread 
- 112
- 49
Top Poster of the Day:
.webp?h=11 "Nuzzles, pounces on you, UwU, you're so warm!..")
Jattuph_Biscuits
Current Registered Users: 31,845
talk about books or smth idk
/h/lit SETTINGS /h/lit MODS /h/lit LOG /h/lit EXILEES /h/lit FOLLOWERS /h/lit BLOCKERS
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!bookworms, whenever /lit/'s taste is stacked up against anyone other than BookTok, BookTube, or /r/books, it's immediately apparent what a bunch of /lit/wits they are.
Also, three James Joyce books, but zero Virginia Woolf books? All the evidence you need that they aren't actually reading these. No amount of misogyny would account for a group that loves Joyce leaving To the Lighthouse off the list entirely.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Brothers Karamazov as number 3 is insane to me, same goes for Notes from Underground as noted by
@jawbreakeraddict
Dostoevsky is the most overrated "western canon" author, I wonder if he sounds good in Russian because the dialogue on the translation to Portuguese I read is super clunky and I can't tell if that's on purpose.
!classics
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe you'd like things better if you read them in a non-monkey language
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I get the feeling that dialogue in these 19th century books are less about being realistic and more about getting the character's point of view across
Either that or dostoevski has never had a real conversation with anyone, ever.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's a Dostoevsky thing. Just compare his dialogue with that of Chekhov or even Tolstoy and the difference is stark, both the latter's dialogue comes out as much more natural.
In comparison half of the characters in Brothers Karamazov sound as if they were on the verge of a mental breakdown. It does make for some very funny scenes, I acknowledge that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I dislike his long novels so much
I can't even tell war and peace and anna karenina apart from how much I loath both books
But his shorter stories are pretty good, he should just never be allowed to introduce an entire mexican telenovela worthy of characters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
they always include crime and punishment too and its dosts worst book, and war and peace over anna karenina
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context