/h/marsey House Femboy
FeynmanDidNothingWrong xd/squee Whereof one cannot speak thereof one must shitpost  3yr ago (image post) Edited 3yr ago 361 thread views #14034

Marsey Nietzsche

Unable to load image

Another existentialist, often misconstrued as a nihilist but actually despised nihilism (as anyone older than 13 should). For when you want to say "based" in a slightly different way

78
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • TheUbieSeether : Ferynam may be fine, but Faucault is a libertarian. Pick a better mascot, bro.

Bonus Marsey, Marsey Foucault, for when you want to lament one of the founders of queer theory and a precursor to the post-modern/ post-structural/ post-myfatnuts movement

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1684139426114806.webp

based off this photo

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841394267494614.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I tried doing Karl Popper (whom plebbit love to abuse his paradox of intolerance) but that neighbor is just an old cracker with big ears and is impossible to marsey-fy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841303533347595.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

rude, popper makes my bussy pop. btw thanks for the sage recommendation, helped me with a tricky integral for my rail gun

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

read another philosopher

Makes sense. They hate the idea of falsifiability.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The thing is, redditors just completely misunderstand what he says about the paradox, and turn it into the exact opposite of what his solution was. Its less that they should read someone else (though they also should), but that they should actually read it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can tolerate anything except things that actually irk me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, Foucault! Hey, Wiki, what were his opinions on s*x with minors??

>Michel Foucault argued that children are able to give consent to sexual relations, saying that assuming “that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.”wiki

Oh, come on! It's just wikipedia! What did he really mean?

>[2] "Under this interpretation of liberté, young children were empowered to find happiness in sexual relationships; their ability to consent was a foregone conclusion. Any effort to suggest otherwise would be a condescension, a disrespect to them as fully realized human beings. In a radio interview in 1978, Michel Foucault said of s*x with minors that assuming “that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.”"

Oh, so long as someone groomed them into "finding" happiness in a sexual relationship, it's okay!

:marseyworried:

Sorry, paedos. Frick off! (lol @ libertarians = p*dophile because Faucault surely is not libertarian). Turn that gas light wayyy up, leftoids!

:marseyangel:

(Nice touch with Lolita in hand).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rent free

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe you too can join them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're just jealous that 14 y/o chad is banging his teacher who made fun of you in high school

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We already have a foucault marsey

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841303361852117.webp

:onfire: :onfire: :onfire:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

another bonus marsey, marsey samuel johnson, for when you cannot believe what you're witnessing or when you want to "refute it thus"

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841295692735398.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not gonna lie, apart from Saint Ted I cant take any philosopher recent enough to have photographs taken of them serious.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's because you can't read

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nevermind. I thought I could make a tedposter=monkey joke.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was just trying to continue by acting like i couldn't understand what you wrote lol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He looks like Dana Carvey as Pistachio Disguisey as the Turtle Guy

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841302604145262.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Everything in woman is a riddle, and everything in woman has one solution –pregnancy.

https://media.tenor.com/ijjvLg8vm3cAAAAx/donkey-kong-punch.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

SRD was God's second mistake.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Existentialism is actually marginally more shameful than nihilism by virtue of nihilism actually saying something.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I FRICKING HATE EXISTENTIALISTS

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

MRW

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Baséd

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nietzsche and existentialists are r-slurred and their wishy-washy bullshit mostly appeal to the simple-minded.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unironically, look at the modern state of the west and tell me his idea of the "letzter Mensch" wasnt 100% on the mark?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.