HugeThompsonblack/jack
HOUSE EDGY RIDE OR DIE
2yr ago#3037612
spent 0 currency on pings
>For adolescents with gender incongruence, the [National Board of Health and Welfare] deems that the risks of puberty suppressing treatment with GnRH-analogues and gender-affirming hormonal treatment currently outweigh the possible benefits, and that the treatments should be offered only in exceptional cases. … To minimize the risk that a young person with gender incongruence later will regret a gender-affirming treatment, the NBHW deems that the criteria for offering GnRH-analogue and gender-affirming hormones should link more closely to those used in the Dutch protocol, where the duration of gender incongruence over time is emphasized
I'm more surprised this is from Sweden, aka "idgaf" the country, than anything else said here
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm more surprised this is from Sweden, aka "idgaf" the country, than anything else said here
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lol even a doc from the dutch institute that started all these nonsense has already raised concerns but some people just pretend to not hear or see it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why are Americans surprised that a system with socialized medicine doesnt bow to corporate trends
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context